May 2013 Archives by author

• Messages sorted by: [ thread ] [ subject ] [ date ]
• More info on this list...

Starting: Tue May 7 16:19:42 UTC 2013
Ending: Fri May 31 19:14:10 UTC 2013
Messages: 39

• [SIPForum-discussion] Stun scope   Abhisek Acharya
• [SIPForum-discussion] Query regarding SIP 183 Session Progress   Banda, Srinivas (Srinivas)
• [SIPForum-discussion] Processing request Request-URI and To URI   Banda, Srinivas (Srinivas)
• [SIPForum-discussion] Should session version in "o=" line be same for 180 ringing and 200 ok message?   Hanuman Das
• [SIPForum-discussion] Processing request Request-URI and To URI   Rakesh Datta
• [SIPForum-discussion] in REGISTER method can we use Tel URI?   Rakesh Datta
• [SIPForum-discussion] Should session version in "o=" line be same for 180 ringing and 200 ok message?   Kovács György
• [SIPForum-discussion] Should session version in "o=" line be same for 180 ringing and 200 ok message?   Stephen James
• [SIPForum-discussion] Should session version in "o=" line be same for 180 ringing and 200 ok message?   Stephen James
• [SIPForum-discussion] Should session version in "o=" line be same for 180 ringing and 200 ok message?   Stephen James
• [SIPForum-discussion] Query regarding SIP 183 Session Progress   Stephen James
• [SIPForum-discussion] call-id and cseq relation -> rfc 3261 clarification help required   Stephen James
• [SIPForum-discussion] Processing request Request-URI and To URI   Joby Joseph
• [SIPForum-discussion] Query for method name in Request URI   Anand Kumar
• [SIPForum-discussion] Query regarding SIP 183 Session Progress   Nikash N
• [SIPForum-discussion] Processing request Request-URI and To URI   Kumarasami Parasuraman-QXVB36
• [SIPForum-discussion] Query for method name in Request URI   Kumarasami Parasuraman-QXVB36
• [SIPForum-discussion] call-id and cseq relation -> rfc 3261 clarification help required   Pritam QA
• [SIPForum-discussion] Regarding calculation of "Out of order" packets in RTP   Badri Ranganathan
• [SIPForum-discussion] history-info : rc, index , mp and np.   Deepak Rawat
• [SIPForum-discussion] Query regarding SIP 183 Session Progress   Partha Ray
• [SIPForum-discussion] Query regarding SIP 183 Session Progress   Partha Ray
• [SIPForum-discussion] Discussion Mailing List Status   Marc Robins
• [SIPForum-discussion] FoIP Task Group Achieves Milestone with the Publication of IETF RFC 6913   Marc Robins
• [SIPForum-discussion] Should session version in "o=" line be same for 180 ringing and 200 ok message?   Srivastava, Gaurav
• [SIPForum-discussion] Should session version in "o=" line be same for 180 ringing and 200 ok message?   Vijay Tiwari
• [SIPForum-discussion] Should session version in "o=" line be same for 180 ringing and 200 ok message?   Vijay Tiwari
• [SIPForum-discussion] call-id and cseq relation -> rfc 3261 clarification help required   Vijay Tiwari
• [SIPForum-discussion] Should session version in "o=" line be same for 180 ringing and 200 ok message?   sri nivas
• [SIPForum-discussion] Stun scope   rahul sankanur
• [SIPForum-discussion] attendent and non attendent in sip   gajendra sharma
• [SIPForum-discussion] Should session version in "o=" line be same for 180 ringing and 200 ok message?   siddharth sharma
• [SIPForum-discussion] Should session version in "o=" line be same for 180 ringing and 200 ok message?   sid
• [SIPForum-discussion] Should session version in "o=" line be same for 180 ringing and 200 ok message?   sid
• [SIPForum-discussion] Regarding SSCA   sid
• [SIPForum-discussion] call-id and cseq relation -> rfc 3261 clarification help required   rupandeep singh
• [SIPForum-discussion] in REGISTER method can we use Tel URI?   rupandeep singh
• [SIPForum-discussion] in REGISTER method can we use Tel URI?   rupandeep singh
• [SIPForum-discussion] in REGISTER method can we use Tel URI?   chandrasekhara.madduri at wipro.com

Last message date: Fri May 31 19:14:10 UTC 2013
Archived on: Sat Apr 22 08:35:33 UTC 2017

• Messages sorted by: [ thread ] [ subject ] [ date ]
• More info on this list...