[SIPForum-discussion] Processing request Request-URI and To URI
Rakesh Datta
rakesh.datta6 at gmail.com
Tue May 28 19:13:30 UTC 2013
No... it's absolutely valid.. Req-URI not having user name but To URI
having user part is possible..
It does not violate any RFC..
- Regards,
Rakesh
CISCO Systems Inc.
On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 7:39 PM, Kumarasami Parasuraman-QXVB36 <
QXVB36 at motorolasolutions.com> wrote:
> ** **
>
> Hi,****
>
> ** **
>
> Is anywhere in the RFC said Processing / generating Request, Request-URI
> and To URI should be same. ****
>
> ** **
>
> While processing request Request-URI has, sip:domain.com and To URI has,
> sip:user at domain.com. Is the UAS can reject the request with 403 Forbidden.
> ****
>
> ** **
>
> Please clarify me.****
>
> ** **
>
> As per the RFC3261(Character Escaping Requirements) , User part is
> optional in both Request-URI and To URI.****
>
> ** **
>
> 19.1.2 Character Escaping Requirements****
>
> ** **
>
> dialog****
>
> reg./redir. Contact/****
>
> default Req.-URI To From Contact R-R/Route external**
> **
>
> *user -- o o o o o o*
>
> password -- o o o o o o****
>
> host -- m m m m m m****
>
> port (1) o - - o o o****
>
> user-param ip o o o o o o****
>
> method INVITE - - - - - o****
>
> maddr-param -- o - - o o o****
>
> ttl-param 1 o - - o - o****
>
> transp.-param (2) o - - o o o****
>
> lr-param -- o - - - o o****
>
> other-param -- o o o o o o****
>
> headers -- - - - o - o****
>
> ** **
>
> Thanks****
>
> ** **
>
> Regards,****
>
> Parasu****
>
> ** **
>
> _______________________________________________
> This is the SIP Forum discussion mailing list
> TO UNSUBSCRIBE, or edit your delivery options, please visit
> http://sipforum.org/mailman/listinfo/discussion
> Post to the list at discussion at sipforum.org
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://sipforum.org/pipermail/discussion/attachments/20130529/958fae17/attachment-0002.html>
More information about the discussion
mailing list