[SIPForum-discussion] nat scenario

Rohan Almeida almeida.rohan at gmail.com
Mon Jan 30 14:00:29 UTC 2012


Hi,

If there are no SBC's configured to handle NATing and R2 is not
'SIP-aware' RTP packets will be dropped.

ragards.

On 1/24/12, Jastak, Eric <Eric.Jastak at adp.com> wrote:
> Assuming that your gateways (SBCs) are setup to handle NAT traversal and SIP
> is taking the same path (i.e., receiving same NAT treatment as RTP), the RTP
> session should be accepted by the media gateways.
>
> From: discussion-bounces at sipforum.org
> [mailto:discussion-bounces at sipforum.org] On Behalf Of Nikos Leontsinis
> Sent: Sunday, January 22, 2012 2:05 PM
> To: discussion at sipforum.org
> Subject: [SIPForum-discussion] nat scenario
>
> In the following scenario:
> R1,2: ROUTER
>
> MGW1-----R1------R2------MGW2
>
> MGW1 media IP: 1.1.1.1
> MGW2 media IP: 2.2.2.2
>
> RTP bi-dir stream is in progress between MGWs and R2 alters (NAT) MGW2 IP
> address so that MGW1 receives RTP packets with 3.3.3.3, say
>
> Is MGW1 going to drop the RTP session/call?
>
> /nikos
>
>
> This message and any attachments are intended only for the use of the
> addressee and may contain information that is privileged and confidential.
> If the reader of the message is not the intended recipient or an authorized
> representative of the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any
> dissemination of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have
> received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by e-mail
> and delete the message and any attachments from your system.
>



More information about the discussion mailing list