[SIPForum-discussion] 180 Ringing not generated

Kumar, Satish satish.kumar at ti.com
Wed Sep 8 18:38:06 UTC 2010


Hi Vidya,
You can check whether RTP packets are received from remote end to local end point thru sniffer. This may confirm the problem is at local end point or remote end point. If RTP packets are seen on the sniffer, your local end point is not handling them properly.

-Satish
________________________________
From: discussion-bounces at sipforum.org [mailto:discussion-bounces at sipforum.org] On Behalf Of AMIT ANAND
Sent: Wednesday, September 08, 2010 7:37 AM
To: vidhya gopalan
Cc: discussion at sipforum.org
Subject: Re: [SIPForum-discussion] 180 Ringing not generated

Hi Vidhya,

Ideally Ring should be generated from the last end ( Final Destination ) or the actual called party. You can not do much trouble shooting at your end , you could only show this to your next hop if that is also belongs to your company then to next hop to that.

One possible reason might be that called party is not generating 180 or its getting lost in network ( which wont happen every time ) or your server is not processing 180 ( For this you need to capture the packets coming in from next hop)

But if they are not sending then you can not do much trouble shooting.

Hope this helps

Cheers




On Tue, Sep 7, 2010 at 1:04 PM, vidhya gopalan <vidhyagcse at gmail.com<mailto:vidhyagcse at gmail.com>> wrote:
Hello everyone,

I am just a beginner in SIP. I am sending a INVITE from one of the endpoints, but the other endpoint doesnt send 180 Ringing back. wat could be the possible reason for failure.



_______________________________________________
This is the SIP Forum discussion mailing list
TO UNSUBSCRIBE, or edit your delivery options, please visit http://sipforum.org/mailman/listinfo/discussion
Post to the list at discussion at sipforum.org<mailto:discussion at sipforum.org>



--
Thanks
Amit Anand
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://sipforum.org/pipermail/discussion/attachments/20100908/37292fb7/attachment-0002.html>


More information about the discussion mailing list