[SIPForum-discussion] SIP Client-Server interaction!
    raj kumaradass 
    rajkumaradass at gmail.com
       
    Sat Oct 16 11:48:49 UTC 2010
    
    
  
Hi Andre,
Appears that the ACK msg is not parsed/understood correctly by SIP server.
To affirm, could you please share us the ethereal/WireShark trace.
thanks,
...Raj
On Fri, Oct 15, 2010 at 6:49 PM, andre heller <andre.heller1 at gmx.de> wrote:
> Hi,
> I have implemented a SIP Client and was testing with a SIP Server in my
> case I made Trixbox to actlike a Server.
>
> I am trying to furnish the details using Wireshark or I can say I am
> furnishing the how the communication took place between Client and Server.
>
> SIP CLIENT                     SIP SERVER
>
>        SIP Request:INVITE
>  ------------------------------------>
>
>
>        SIP Status: 100 Trying
>  <------------------------------------
>
>
>        SIP/SDP Status: 200 OK
>  <------------------------------------
>
>
>        SIP Request:ACK
>  ------------------------------------>
>
>
>
>        SIP/SDP Status: 200 OK
>  <------------------------------------
>
>
>        SIP/SDP Status: 200 OK
>  <------------------------------------
>
>
>        SIP/SDP Status: 200 OK
>  <------------------------------------
>
>
>        SIP/SDP Status: 200 OK
>  <------------------------------------
>
> here my question is even though the client have sent the ACK, still the
> Server is sending 200 OK until the timeout.
>
> What do you guys think, am I missing something here. By the way it is
> SIP/UDP.
>
> Regards,
> Andre
> --
> GRATIS! Movie-FLAT mit über 300 Videos.
> Jetzt freischalten unter http://portal.gmx.net/de/go/maxdome
> _______________________________________________
> This is the SIP Forum discussion mailing list
> TO UNSUBSCRIBE, or edit your delivery options, please visit
> http://sipforum.org/mailman/listinfo/discussion
> Post to the list at discussion at sipforum.org
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://sipforum.org/pipermail/discussion/attachments/20101016/7b5255be/attachment-0002.html>
    
    
More information about the discussion
mailing list