[SIPForum-discussion] low ALOC (ACD) on protocol conversion

[Dilip Kumar]

Hi Eshan,

Can you share a call capture for one such instance..with source customer &
destination IP endpoint.

Regards,
Dilip.

On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 8:43 PM, Ehsan-Pars <ehsan at parscarrier.com> wrote:

>  Hi Dilip,
>
>
>
> Our Customers are VOIP Wholesales providers that are sending calls to our
> SSW (MVTS II) , then we route them to our vendors that most of them have
> VOIP GW s (Quintum Tenors , CISCO call manager ).
>
> Most of our customers send calls in H.323 and as our vendors GWs are H.323
> too ,so there is no signaling conversion , but for some of our customers
> that are sending calls in SIP we have to convert them to H.323 then route to
> our vendors GW`s.
>
>
>
> BR,
>
> Ehsan
>
>
>
> *From:* Dilip Kumar [mailto:dondilip at gmail.com]
> *Sent:* Monday, November 15, 2010 12:30 PM
> *To:* Ehsan
> *Cc:* discussion at sipforum.org
> *Subject:* Re: [SIPForum-discussion] low ALOC (ACD) on protocol conversion
>
>
>
> Hi Eshan,
>
> Can you brief more your VOIP Network( Like Incoming & Outgoing Leg).
>
> Regards,
> Dilip Kumar
>
> On Fri, Nov 12, 2010 at 11:35 PM, Ehsan <ehsan at parscarrier.com> wrote:
>
> Hi All,
>
>
>
> Does any body know if the protocol conversion between SIP and H.323 can
> affect on ALOC (ACD)?
>
> Actually we are using MVTS II as softswitch and experiencing very low ACD
> for one of our customers who sends SIP calls to our H.323 GWs.
>
>
>
> BR,
>
> Ehsan
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> This is the SIP Forum discussion mailing list
> TO UNSUBSCRIBE, or edit your delivery options, please visit
> http://sipforum.org/mailman/listinfo/discussion
> Post to the list at discussion at sipforum.org
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://sipforum.org/pipermail/discussion/attachments/20101119/8a598c8e/attachment-0002.html>