[SIPForum-discussion] Regarding Unsupported URI
Umang
umang2382 at gmail.com
Thu Feb 11 20:52:14 UTC 2010
Please look at Test Procedure
http://cert.v6pc.jp/sip-ipv6/ua6/doc-1.2/sip-ipv6-ua/UA/torture/UA-16-2-31.html
Umang Patel | MIT | Communications Research Engineer
On Thu, Feb 11, 2010 at 12:16 PM, lakhan patel <lakhan.p at gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi All,
>
>
> SUB A
> B2BUA SUB B
> | REGISTER
> | |
>
> |----------------------->| |
> | 200 OK
> | |
>
> |<-----------------------| |
> |
> | REGISTER |
> |
> |<----------------------|
> |
> | 200 OK |
> |
> |---------------------->|
> Receive an INVITE request | INVITE W/SDP|
> |
> with Unsupported URI scheme |----------------------->|
> |
> | 416 Unsupp URI|
> |
> Sends a 416 Unsupported |<----------------------|
> |
> URI scheme response | |
> |
>
>
> In this call flow SUB-A is sending INVITE request with unsupported URI for
> that SUB-A receive "416 Unsupported URI scheme,
>
> *1. Can any one tell me, Do SUB-A need to send ACK for 416?
> 2. What should be the behavior of B2BUA when SUB-A doesn't ACK for 416?
>
> Do we need to send ACK for every 4xx response?*
>
> *In this scenario SUB-A sending unsupported URI in INVITE request, What
> happen when it send unsupported URI in REGISTRATION itself?
> Again do SUB-A need to ACK for 416?*
>
> Thank you all in advance for responding my query :)
>
> --
> Thanks & Regards
> Shivlakhan Patel
> Email: lakhan.p at gmail.com, lakhan.p at hotmail.com
> IBM India Private Ltd. Bangalore
> Contact: +91-9902791177
>
> _______________________________________________
> This is the SIP Forum discussion mailing list
> TO UNSUBSCRIBE, or edit your delivery options, please visit
> http://sipforum.org/mailman/listinfo/discussion
> Post to the list at discussion at sipforum.org
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://sipforum.org/pipermail/discussion/attachments/20100211/47c369b2/attachment-0002.html>
More information about the discussion
mailing list