[SIPForum-discussion] Antwort: SIP Trunk Delivery from Telco Carrier
Roland.Gloeckler at arcor.net
Roland.Gloeckler at arcor.net
Wed Oct 1 09:20:21 UTC 2008
Hi Fortunato,
in my company we offer SIP trunks in the following flavors:
- over open Internet (mainly used for interop testing): only as secure as
your WAN connection
- over private MPLS-VPNs (mainly used for customers with several sites):
not visible for other customers
- over IPsec VPNs: Well, if the encryption algorithm is not flawed, this
one is the most secure. Obviously it requires most resources of the
options (key management, IPsec implementation, real-time
encryption & decryption, etc.).
We are also working on TLS/SRTP, but have not released it yet.
Regards,
Roland
01.10.2008 04:31
Gesendet von: discussion-bounces at sipforum.org
Absender:
"Fortunato Lacson" <junlacson at gmail.com>
An
discussion at sipforum.org
Kopie
Thema
[SIPForum-discussion] SIP Trunk Delivery from Telco Carrier
Hello All.
For those who have experience taking SIP trunk from Telco Vendors. Do you
take it through the open internet? Or, do you take it using some form of
tunelling (virtual WAN), or maybe something else. What would be the
advantage or disadvantage of each. Also, what forms of security measure,
if any, do you implement while traversing it.
I would like to get a feel of real world implementation.
Good day,
Fortunato
_______________________________________________
This is the SIP Forum discussion mailing list
TO UNSUBSCRIBE, or edit your delivery options, please visit
http://sipforum.org/mailman/listinfo/discussion
Post to the list at discussion at sipforum.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://sipforum.org/pipermail/discussion/attachments/20081001/287954cf/attachment-0002.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature
Size: 4044 bytes
Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
URL: <http://sipforum.org/pipermail/discussion/attachments/20081001/287954cf/attachment-0002.bin>
More information about the discussion
mailing list