[SIPForum-discussion] Identity New Subject RFC 4474

Robert Sparks rjsparks at nostrum.com
Fri Jan 4 20:48:44 UTC 2008


I think you'll find what you want by searching for "Identity" on this  
page:
https://www.sipit.net/SIPit20_Summary

RjS

On Jan 4, 2008, at 2:39 PM, <dward at ithinktest.com>  
<dward at ithinktest.com> wrote:

> Hi Robert – Sorry, I’m new to the alias.  I guess this subject was  
> discussed in the past.  However, I’m inquiring to see how many  
> companies are actually implementing it in practice for we are  
> thinking of implementing this feature into our test toolsets.  Is  
> there any interest? ~ dw
>
> From: Robert Sparks [mailto:rjsparks at nostrum.com]
> Sent: Friday, January 04, 2008 11:48 AM
> To: dward at ithinktest.com
> Cc: 'monica'; discussion at sipforum.org
> Subject: Identity (was Re: [SIPForum-discussion] some parameters in  
> Record-Route header)
>
> Identity?
>
> Yeah - there's been testing at SIPit.
>
> Was that a subject change? Or did I miss the tie-in with earlier  
> question?
> For complete subject changes, please do touch the Subject: line to  
> reflect it.
>
> RjS
>
> On Jan 4, 2008, at 12:18 PM, <dward at ithinktest.com> wrote:
>
>
> Has anyone implemented RFC 4474? ~ Dennis
>
> From: discussion-bounces at sipforum.org [mailto:discussion- 
> bounces at sipforum.org] On Behalf Of Robert Sparks
> Sent: Thursday, January 03, 2008 7:00 PM
> To: monica
> Cc: discussion at sipforum.org
> Subject: Re: [SIPForum-discussion] some parameters in Record-Route  
> header
>
> Nope. I don't believe they're standardized.
>
> That said, the spec is clear on what to do with parameters you  
> don't recognize. You leave them alone.
> You keep them in the URIs you put into Routes based on Record- 
> Route. For everything but ;lr and the
> transport-related parameters defined in 3261, these parameters are  
> only some element talking to itself.
> They don't change the behavior of any other element in the network,  
> and it's required to give the thing
> that put the record-route header value there exactly what it asked  
> for back in the Route header.
>
> RjS
>
> On Jan 3, 2008, at 7:57 PM, monica wrote:
>
>
>
> Hi All,
>
>
> I find a sip package which Record-Route header is like:
> Record-Route:<sip:139.24.125.12;lr;pm;n2>
>
> I don't know what's the meaning of the parameters 'pm' and 'n2'.  
> Does somebody know these 2 parameters?
> Thanks.
>
>
> Regards,
> monica
>
>
> “七件武器,七种完美” 立刻体验!
> _______________________________________________
> This is the SIP Forum discussion mailing list
> TO UNSUBSCRIBE, or edit your delivery options, please visit http:// 
> sipforum.org/mailman/listinfo/discussion
> Post to the list at discussion at sipforum.org
>
> _______________________________________________
> This is the SIP Forum discussion mailing list
> TO UNSUBSCRIBE, or edit your delivery options, please visit http:// 
> sipforum.org/mailman/listinfo/discussion
> Post to the list at discussion at sipforum.org
>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://sipforum.org/pipermail/discussion/attachments/20080104/29fa1e00/attachment-0014.html>


More information about the discussion mailing list