[SIPForum-discussion] 185 ringing / 199 trying

[Raj]

I am unable to find 185 or 199 response in 3261, is it defined in any other
RFC.

On Fri, Apr 25, 2008 at 9:04 PM, Hadriel Kaplan <HKaplan at acmepacket.com>
wrote:

>
> A "reason phrase" is purely descriptive, and you should NOT expect to
> receive or check for any particular string there.  Please don't expect it to
> be a fixed well-known string, such as the "defaults" in rfc3261.  For
> example lots of devices use different reason-phrases for 4xx and 5xx error
> responses.  Your code should just act on the number, not the phrase.  My 2
> cents anyway.
>
> -hadriel
>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: discussion-bounces at sipforum.org [mailto:discussion-
> > bounces at sipforum.org] On Behalf Of Karthik Ramiya
> > Sent: Friday, April 25, 2008 6:21 AM
> > To: Malay Si; gaurav katiyar; mwilliam prusty; discussion at sipforum.org
> > Subject: Re: [SIPForum-discussion] 185 ringing / 199 trying
> >
> >
> > Hi Malaysi,
> >
> >        I agree with you. But here it is clearly defined like the reason
> > phase is 185 ringing / 199 trying, So you mean like irrespective of the
> > reason phases, it wll jus look into the 1XX response and treat it as
> 183??
> > In that case, it means that there wont be any recognition for the reason
> > phase rite.
> >
> > Please clarify,
> >
> > Thanks and regards,
> > Karthik
> >
>
> _______________________________________________
> This is the SIP Forum discussion mailing list
> TO UNSUBSCRIBE, or edit your delivery options, please visit
> http://sipforum.org/mailman/listinfo/discussion
> Post to the list at discussion at sipforum.org
>



-- 
-Raaz
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://sipforum.org/pipermail/discussion/attachments/20080426/28497d67/attachment-0002.html>