[SIPForum-discussion] Can I use SIPp as a base to implement someauthentication schemes and test its performance?

[Subbarao, PraveenKumar]

Hi,

 

A good option for the open source will be JAIN SIP Stack. Just google
for this.

 

Praveen

 

________________________________

From: discussion-bounces at sipforum.org
[mailto:discussion-bounces at sipforum.org] On Behalf Of mjhorse
Sent: Friday, April 11, 2008 9:05 AM
To: discussion
Subject: [SIPForum-discussion] Can I use SIPp as a base to implement
someauthentication schemes and test its performance?

 

Hi, all:

 

    I'm a student and I'm doing some research in SIP authentication
mechanism. I've read some RFCs and design a SIP authentication scheme
myself, and now I want to test its performance, its round delay time
comparative to the one without it e.g.. 

 

    But I'm not farmiliar with SIP-related development at all, despite I
have some knowledge regarding C/C++ programming. So, can you guys tell
me whether SIPp, which I've seen frequently in this maillist, can help
me to fulfill this goal convieniently enough? Or can you give some
advices that which opensource stack of SIP is most appropriate to my
idea?

 

    More details: I want to extend the beviour of UAC/UAS as well as
proxy( adding some identifiers and header fields in sip message, e.g.)
making them can calculate some digest used as signature and so on. I
used a extension tag to indicate these behaviors which I've defined in
my scheme.

 

    Thanks a lot.



This e-mail and any attachment is for authorised use by the intended recipient(s) only. It may contain proprietary material, confidential information and/or be subject to legal privilege. It should not be copied, disclosed to, retained or used by, any other party. If you are not an intended recipient then please promptly delete this e-mail and any attachment and all copies and inform the sender. Thank you.

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://sipforum.org/pipermail/discussion/attachments/20080411/b2f2a8bc/attachment-0002.html>