[SIPForum-discussion] Record-Route

madhumanjusha at integramicro.com madhumanjusha at integramicro.com
Wed Feb 6 03:17:27 UTC 2013


Hi,
Yeah you are right,SIP server cannot force UAC to do so but if that header
is in the message,UAC generally consider the server in that session,am not
sure of the ignored cases.
Industry:It depends on the specs(specifications).

On Tue, February 5, 2013 3:51 pm, Mickael Marrache wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
> The assumption here is that the UAs conform to RFC3261. But, a UA may
> also ignore the Record-route headers and exchange future messages
> directly. So, a SIP server cannot force UAs to exchange messages through
> it, it can also ask them to do so. One should be careful when depending
> on this mechanism.
>
> What do you think? For which purposes these headers are used in the
> industry?
>
> Mickael
>
>
> Le 31 בינו 2013 à 07:00, madhumanjusha at integramicro.com a écrit :
>
>
>> Hello Kumar,
>>
>>
>> Below, client1 and client2 are depending on sip server(proxy say) as
>> they are not known to each other,so flow will be
>>
>> client1-invite -------->sip server-invite--------->client2 .
>> .
>> .
>>
>>
>> client1 <---------------200OK-sip server<---------200ok-client2
>>
>> As client1 now familiar with client2's ip address in 200ok,it sends ACK
>>  directly to client2 bypassing sip server. client1 -ACK
>> ------------------------------------------>client2
>> RTP
>> <---------------------------------------------------------->
>> client1-BYE--------------------------------------------->client2
>>
>> To avoid such bypass,sip server should add Record-route header ,so that
>> it can be till the session ends..... client1-ACK----------->sip
>> server-ACK------------->client2
>>
>> RTP
>> <------------------------------------------------------->
>>
>>
>> client1-BYE----------->sip server-BYE------------->client2
>>
>> If any queries feel free to discuss.
>> Thanks,
>> Manjusha.
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Jan 30, 2013 at 6:10 PM, tapender kumar
>> <tapender5002 at gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>
>> Dear All,
>> Can you describe me about Record-Route.Why we are using Record route?
>> --
>>
>>
>> With Regards,
>> Tapender Kumar
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> This is the SIP Forum discussion mailing list
>> TO UNSUBSCRIBE, or edit your delivery options, please visit
>> http://sipforum.org/mailman/listinfo/discussion
>> Post to the list at discussion at sipforum.org
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On Wed, January 30, 2013 7:40 am, tapender kumar wrote:
>>
>>> Dear All,
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Can you describe me about Record-Route.Why we are using Record route?
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> With Regards,
>>> Tapender Kumar
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> This is the SIP Forum discussion mailing list
>>> TO UNSUBSCRIBE, or edit your delivery options, please visit
>>> http://sipforum.org/mailman/listinfo/discussion
>>> Post to the list at discussion at sipforum.org
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> Thanks & Regards,
>> Manjusha A.
>> Integra Micro Software Services (P) Ltd.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> This is the SIP Forum discussion mailing list
>> TO UNSUBSCRIBE, or edit your delivery options, please visit
>> http://sipforum.org/mailman/listinfo/discussion
>> Post to the list at discussion at sipforum.org
>>
>


Thanks & Regards,
Manjusha A.
Integra Micro Software Services (P) Ltd.






More information about the discussion mailing list