[SIPForum-discussion] ICE - Connectivity check Algorithm

rahul sankanur rahul.sankanur at gmail.com
Tue Aug 6 04:01:24 UTC 2013


Hi Manoj,
Thanks for the reply.
My question was whether connectivity checks for the media streams will
begin simultaneously or one after the other.
For Eg:
If I have 2 streams say Audio and Video and Audio has highest priority. The
connectivity checks for video will start after completion of Audio or it
will start when Audio checks are still going on.


On Tue, Aug 6, 2013 at 12:54 AM, Manoj Raju <manoj.raju at ymail.com> wrote:

> Hi,
>
> As per rfc 5245, the candidate pairs are sorted based on  Priority.
>
> And checks are done in sequence  from high priority to low priority. so
> connectivity checks for all pairs won't begin at same time.
>
> Regards,
> Manoj Raju
>
>
>    *From:* rahul sankanur <rahul.sankanur at gmail.com>
> *To:* "discussion at sipforum.org" <discussion at sipforum.org>
> *Sent:* Tuesday, 30 July 2013 11:02 AM
> *Subject:* [SIPForum-discussion] ICE - Connectivity check Algorithm
>
> Hi ,
> In ICE rfc 5245, it is mentioned that connectivity checks will start for
> the first media stream(as mentioned in SDP) .
> There is also a mention that each media stream will have independent
> timers which decides the interval between connectivity checks and RTO for
> those candidates,
>
> I have a doubt here.
>
> Connectivity checks will begin at the same time for all media stream
>                                               OR
> connectivity checks will begin for the second media stream only after
> first media stream's connectivity checks are over.
>
> Regards,
> Rahul Sankanur
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> This is the SIP Forum discussion mailing list
> TO UNSUBSCRIBE, or edit your delivery options, please visit
> http://sipforum.org/mailman/listinfo/discussion
> Post to the list at discussion at sipforum.org
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://sipforum.org/pipermail/discussion/attachments/20130806/ff773456/attachment.html 


More information about the discussion mailing list