[SIPForum-discussion] SDP with both sendrecv & sendonly
Mathew Sordyl
msordyl at capella.ca
Fri Mar 9 15:45:37 UTC 2012
Hi Guys,
This might be a basic question for you guys, but I am struggling with a SIP
trunking error. I am using Mirial softphone and I receive error 401
Unauthorized every time I try to initiate a call, please shed some light.
X-Lite 4 works with no problems.
Thank You
Mathew Sordyl, UC Sales Engineer
Capella Telecommunications Inc.
747 Monaghan Road
Peterborough, ON K9J 5K2
Tel: 905-450-2177
Cell: 416-606-8060
Fax: 705-748-4535
<http://www.capella.ca/> http://www.capella.ca
From: pradeep kumar [mailto:pradeep872k at gmail.com]
Sent: March-08-12 7:39 AM
To: Abhishek.17.Kumar
Cc: discussion at sipforum.org
Subject: Re: [SIPForum-discussion] SDP with both sendrecv & sendonly
yes it is possible, one is for video port and another one is audio,
thanks
On Tue, Mar 6, 2012 at 11:38 PM, Abhishek.17.Kumar
<AK0057211 at techmahindra.com> wrote:
Hi All,
Can we send both attributes (sendrecv & sendonly) in single Request.
a=rtpmap:0 PCMU/8000/1
a=rtpmap:8 PCMA/8000/1
a=sendrecv
a=ptime:20
a=sendonly
Regards,
-Abhishek
============================================================================
================================================
Disclaimer: This message and the information contained herein is
proprietary and confidential and subject to the
Tech Mahindra policy statement, you may review the policy at
http://www.techmahindra.com/Disclaimer.html
externally and http://tim.techmahindra.com/tim/disclaimer.html internally
within Tech Mahindra.
============================================================================
================================================
_______________________________________________
This is the SIP Forum discussion mailing list
TO UNSUBSCRIBE, or edit your delivery options, please visit
http://sipforum.org/mailman/listinfo/discussion
Post to the list at discussion at sipforum.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://sipforum.org/pipermail/discussion/attachments/20120309/34481dcf/attachment-0002.html>
More information about the discussion
mailing list