[SIPForum-discussion] Transaction Stateful Proxy

[Abhisek Acharya]

yeah it creates two call legs.

On Wed, Dec 26, 2012 at 11:34 PM, Dinesh Rao <dinesh2022 at gmail.com> wrote:

> If B2BUA is forwarding the receiving invite than it will decrease
> Max-Forwards count but generally B2BUA generate new INVITE so Max-Forwards
> is set to 70.
>
> Regards
> C.Dinesh
>
>
> On Mon, Dec 24, 2012 at 10:48 PM, Abhisek Acharya <
> abhisek.acharya at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> so you mean it decreases for B2Bs as well..?
>>
>>
>> abhisek
>> pune
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Dec 24, 2012 at 4:36 PM, Dinesh Rao <dinesh2022 at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> It decreases for all SIP supporting components.
>>>
>>> Regards
>>> C.Dinesh
>>>
>>>
>>> On Mon, Dec 24, 2012 at 9:29 AM, Abhisek Acharya <
>>> abhisek.acharya at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> but it does not decrease for B2Bs I guess.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Sun, Dec 23, 2012 at 11:25 AM, Dinesh Rao <dinesh2022 at gmail.com>wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Max-forwards decreases for both statefull and stateless proxies.
>>>>>
>>>>> Regards
>>>>> C.Dinesh
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Tue, Dec 18, 2012 at 8:18 PM, Abhisek Acharya <
>>>>> abhisek.acharya at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> ohh yes I am sorry that is Maxforwards....should get decreased by a
>>>>>> value 1.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Tue, Dec 18, 2012 at 11:46 PM, tester voip <tester.voip1 at gmail.com
>>>>>> > wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> just a smal corectn.
>>>>>>> it should be max-orward rather than C-Seq.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Fri, Nov 30, 2012 at 9:44 AM, Abhisek Acharya <
>>>>>>> abhisek.acharya at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> there are a lot of call processing scenarios you can test ....
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> check RFC 3261 for that for a better insite
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Fri, Nov 30, 2012 at 9:43 AM, Abhisek Acharya <
>>>>>>>> abhisek.acharya at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> well first of all send a initial INVITE with a To-tag.Proxy should
>>>>>>>>> reject it if not a MUST.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> 2.Proxy can send CANCEL upon timer expiry.
>>>>>>>>> 3.Make a call and check the C-seq ..it should decrease by a value
>>>>>>>>> 1.
>>>>>>>>> 4
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On Mon, Nov 19, 2012 at 3:02 PM, Keerthi Srinivasan <
>>>>>>>>> keerthivarmansrinivasan at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> All,
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Can anyone help me in testing Transaction Stateful Proxy?
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> What are the scenario we can test?
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>>>>>> Keerthi
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>>>>> This is the SIP Forum discussion mailing list
>>>>>>>>>> TO UNSUBSCRIBE, or edit your delivery options, please visit
>>>>>>>>>> http://sipforum.org/mailman/listinfo/discussion
>>>>>>>>>> Post to the list at discussion at sipforum.org
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>>> This is the SIP Forum discussion mailing list
>>>>>>>> TO UNSUBSCRIBE, or edit your delivery options, please visit
>>>>>>>> http://sipforum.org/mailman/listinfo/discussion
>>>>>>>> Post to the list at discussion at sipforum.org
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>> This is the SIP Forum discussion mailing list
>>>>>> TO UNSUBSCRIBE, or edit your delivery options, please visit
>>>>>> http://sipforum.org/mailman/listinfo/discussion
>>>>>> Post to the list at discussion at sipforum.org
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> *C.Dinesh*
>>> Sr. Software Engineer
>>> Panterra Networks
>>>
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> *C.Dinesh*
> Sr. Software Engineer
> Panterra Networks
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://sipforum.org/pipermail/discussion/attachments/20121227/237f712b/attachment-0002.html>