[SIPForum-discussion] Transaction Stateful Proxy

[Dinesh Rao]

If B2BUA is forwarding the receiving invite than it will decrease
Max-Forwards count but generally B2BUA generate new INVITE so Max-Forwards
is set to 70.

Regards
C.Dinesh

On Mon, Dec 24, 2012 at 10:48 PM, Abhisek Acharya <abhisek.acharya at gmail.com
> wrote:

> so you mean it decreases for B2Bs as well..?
>
>
> abhisek
> pune
>
>
> On Mon, Dec 24, 2012 at 4:36 PM, Dinesh Rao <dinesh2022 at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> It decreases for all SIP supporting components.
>>
>> Regards
>> C.Dinesh
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Dec 24, 2012 at 9:29 AM, Abhisek Acharya <
>> abhisek.acharya at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> but it does not decrease for B2Bs I guess.
>>>
>>>
>>> On Sun, Dec 23, 2012 at 11:25 AM, Dinesh Rao <dinesh2022 at gmail.com>wrote:
>>>
>>>> Max-forwards decreases for both statefull and stateless proxies.
>>>>
>>>> Regards
>>>> C.Dinesh
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Tue, Dec 18, 2012 at 8:18 PM, Abhisek Acharya <
>>>> abhisek.acharya at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> ohh yes I am sorry that is Maxforwards....should get decreased by a
>>>>> value 1.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Tue, Dec 18, 2012 at 11:46 PM, tester voip <tester.voip1 at gmail.com>wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> just a smal corectn.
>>>>>> it should be max-orward rather than C-Seq.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Fri, Nov 30, 2012 at 9:44 AM, Abhisek Acharya <
>>>>>> abhisek.acharya at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> there are a lot of call processing scenarios you can test ....
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> check RFC 3261 for that for a better insite
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Fri, Nov 30, 2012 at 9:43 AM, Abhisek Acharya <
>>>>>>> abhisek.acharya at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> well first of all send a initial INVITE with a To-tag.Proxy should
>>>>>>>> reject it if not a MUST.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> 2.Proxy can send CANCEL upon timer expiry.
>>>>>>>> 3.Make a call and check the C-seq ..it should decrease by a value 1.
>>>>>>>> 4
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Mon, Nov 19, 2012 at 3:02 PM, Keerthi Srinivasan <
>>>>>>>> keerthivarmansrinivasan at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> All,
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Can anyone help me in testing Transaction Stateful Proxy?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> What are the scenario we can test?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>>>>> Keerthi
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>>>> This is the SIP Forum discussion mailing list
>>>>>>>>> TO UNSUBSCRIBE, or edit your delivery options, please visit
>>>>>>>>> http://sipforum.org/mailman/listinfo/discussion
>>>>>>>>> Post to the list at discussion at sipforum.org
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>> This is the SIP Forum discussion mailing list
>>>>>>> TO UNSUBSCRIBE, or edit your delivery options, please visit
>>>>>>> http://sipforum.org/mailman/listinfo/discussion
>>>>>>> Post to the list at discussion at sipforum.org
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> This is the SIP Forum discussion mailing list
>>>>> TO UNSUBSCRIBE, or edit your delivery options, please visit
>>>>> http://sipforum.org/mailman/listinfo/discussion
>>>>> Post to the list at discussion at sipforum.org
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> *C.Dinesh*
>> Sr. Software Engineer
>> Panterra Networks
>>
>
>


-- 
*C.Dinesh*
Sr. Software Engineer
Panterra Networks
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://sipforum.org/pipermail/discussion/attachments/20121226/a354dfa7/attachment-0002.html>