[SIPForum-discussion] Register without contact header

Bob Penfield BPenfield at acmepacket.com
Wed Apr 25 19:19:39 UTC 2012


As someone else stated, a REGISTER without a Contact is a query for the current bindings. It is perfectly legal. As with all REGISTER 200OK responses, the response will contain the current bindings.


cheers,
(-:bob



From: discussion-bounces at sipforum.org [mailto:discussion-bounces at sipforum.org] On Behalf Of Sumit Gautam
Sent: Wednesday, April 25, 2012 9:18 AM
To: discussion at sipforum.org; Dinesh Rao
Subject: Re: [SIPForum-discussion] Register without contact header

Register request having no 'Contact' header should be rejected by UAS with '400 Bad Request' response.


Thanks,

Sumit

--- On Tue, 24/4/12, Dinesh Rao <dinesh2022 at gmail.com<mailto:dinesh2022 at gmail.com>> wrote:

From: Dinesh Rao <dinesh2022 at gmail.com<mailto:dinesh2022 at gmail.com>>
Subject: [SIPForum-discussion] Register without contact header
To: discussion at sipforum.org<mailto:discussion at sipforum.org>
Date: Tuesday, 24 April, 2012, 11:45 AM

In register request,if contact header is missing, then is the request is processed or dropped? And what is the response for missing any mandatory header in register request.

Thanks
C.Dinesh
Software Engineer
Panterra Networks

-----Inline Attachment Follows-----
_______________________________________________
This is the SIP Forum discussion mailing list
TO UNSUBSCRIBE, or edit your delivery options, please visit http://sipforum.org/mailman/listinfo/discussion
Post to the list at discussion at sipforum.org</mc/compose?to=discussion at sipforum.org>


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://sipforum.org/pipermail/discussion/attachments/20120425/bf645a2f/attachment-0002.html>


More information about the discussion mailing list