[SIPForum-discussion] FORMAT FOR A SIPS URI

[HM Kias]

Hi,

The format is correct and valid.


Regards,

Kias




On Sun, Oct 2, 2011 at 5:03 AM, Stephen James <sjames_1958 at yahoo.com> wrote:

> The phone-context parameter is a tel uri parameter and is attached to the
> user portion.
> See tel uri RFC for this and 3261 for how tel uris are converted to sip
> URIs.
> These are all valid URIs.
>
> Stephen
>
>
> Sent from my iPad
>
> On Sep 29, 2011, at 14:58, OSWALDO TORRES <waldoto at yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> > Hello, my ISP send me that INVITE.
> > I have a doubt in the URI.
> > Received:
> > INVITE sip:6795;phone-context=local at ntlpba.mx;user=phone;behindnat
> SIP/2.0
> > From: <sip:8182213405;phone-context=national at ntlpba.mx
> ;user=phone>;tag=80315
> > To: <sip:6795;phone-context=local at ntlpba.mx;user=phone>
> >
> >
> >
> > Is correct, that format sip:user;uri-parameters=parameter-value at domain;uri-parameters=parameter-value;behindnat
> SIP/2.0
> >
> > O it must be:
> >
> >
> > sip:user at domain;uri-parameters=parameter-value;uri-parameters=parameter-value;behindnat
> SIP/2.0
> >
> >
> > Basically, my doubt is after the user must have the domain or not ?
> > _______________________________________________
> > This is the SIP Forum discussion mailing list
> > TO UNSUBSCRIBE, or edit your delivery options, please visit
> http://sipforum.org/mailman/listinfo/discussion
> > Post to the list at discussion at sipforum.org
>
> _______________________________________________
> This is the SIP Forum discussion mailing list
> TO UNSUBSCRIBE, or edit your delivery options, please visit
> http://sipforum.org/mailman/listinfo/discussion
> Post to the list at discussion at sipforum.org
>



-- 
HM Kias
91-9443467600
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://sipforum.org/pipermail/discussion/attachments/20111003/3fb6a363/attachment-0002.html>