[SIPForum-discussion] Why Dialog Id contains both local tag and remote tag?

Ramakrishnan R ram65.vidya at gmail.com
Tue May 24 15:17:54 UTC 2011


The calling party creates the 'call-id'. That is unique, and is good enough
identification too. The 'remote-tag' is needed for forking proxies to
identify the responses from multiple end points. But I am not able
understand the need for 'local-tag'. Can any one explain this?

Regards,
Ramki


On Tue, May 24, 2011 at 3:46 PM, Perttu Ahvenainen <
mosseahvenainen at gmail.com> wrote:

> Hello,
>
> SIP dialog is a active dialog between two endpoints. Thats why
> identification of a dialog has to also be "signed" with both endpoints and
> dialog represents peer-to-peer SIP relationship between those two endpoints.
>
> -Perttu Ahvenainen
>
> 2011/5/22 Ramakrishnan R <ram65.vidya at gmail.com>
>
>>
>> Dialog ID is defined as "call-id + local-tag + remote-tag".
>>
>> Is "remote-tag" alone not sufficient ? Why "local-tag" is also needed?
>>
>> Any insights?
>>
>> Thanks & regards,
>>  Ramakrishnan
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> This is the SIP Forum discussion mailing list
>> TO UNSUBSCRIBE, or edit your delivery options, please visit
>> http://sipforum.org/mailman/listinfo/discussion
>> Post to the list at discussion at sipforum.org
>>
>>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://sipforum.org/pipermail/discussion/attachments/20110524/9ab08d97/attachment-0002.html>


More information about the discussion mailing list