[SIPForum-discussion] IBCF to IBCF

ridhuan yusof mridhuan at gmail.com
Sat Mar 12 10:44:50 UTC 2011


Thanks Sumeet.

If so which header to define CLIR service ?


On Sat, Mar 12, 2011 at 12:36 PM, Sumeetkumar Bhardwaj <
sumeet_bhardwaj at persistent.co.in> wrote:

> Hello,
>
> PAI header is suppose to contain some critical values of private network
> which must be removed from the SIP message when it goes from trusted network
> to untrusted network.
> There are similar kind of headers like PAI which needs to be removed when
> it goes to untrusted network and are not part of SIP RFC 3261. They are
> suppose to  flow only in trusted networks (Like PANI and PAI etc).
>
> I think, The headers which are present in SIP RFC 3261 can be carry
> forwarded to untrusted network.
>
> Thanks,
> Sumeet
>
> ________________________________________
> From: discussion-bounces at sipforum.org [discussion-bounces at sipforum.org] On
> Behalf Of ridhuan yusof [mridhuan at gmail.com]
> Sent: Friday, March 11, 2011 12:00 PM
> To: discussion at sipforum.org
> Subject: [SIPForum-discussion] IBCF to IBCF
>
> Folks,
>
> I'm doing study for interworking between IMS-IMS using IBCF.. Another IMS
> is treated as Untrusted Network..
> Which SIP header can be allowed to carried out from my network to another
> network? How about PAI header?
>
> regards
> Ridhuan
>
> DISCLAIMER
> ==========
> This e-mail may contain privileged and confidential information which is
> the property of Persistent Systems Ltd. It is intended only for the use of
> the individual or entity to which it is addressed. If you are not the
> intended recipient, you are not authorized to read, retain, copy, print,
> distribute or use this message. If you have received this communication in
> error, please notify the sender and delete all copies of this message.
> Persistent Systems Ltd. does not accept any liability for virus infected
> mails.
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://sipforum.org/pipermail/discussion/attachments/20110312/3d170fc0/attachment-0002.html>


More information about the discussion mailing list