[SIPForum-discussion] : Voice call considered as video

Mithilesh kumar kumar.mithilesh at gmail.com
Thu Dec 22 06:10:46 UTC 2011


Hi,
     Just to add,
      Either party B might have removed the complete video param in SDP or
m=video 0 RTP/AVP.
      From SBC points of view it should check Party B's SDP, which may come
in 180,200, ACK, OPTION, UPDATE etc.

On Wed, Dec 21, 2011 at 4:13 PM, Kashif Husain <kashifhusain29 at gmail.com>wrote:

> Party B might have rejected the video by responding with port 0. In this
> case the SDP will have video m=line like this:
> m=video 0 RTP/AVP
>
> Thanks,
> -kashif
>
> On Sat, Dec 17, 2011 at 5:32 PM, Ahmed A Omer <abdi1978 at hotmail.com>wrote:
>
>>  Hey all
>> I have a case where INVITE message is sending video codec in the
>> negotiation and along with the call  but as the B number have no video
>> enabled call becomes voice only!
>>
>> But the CDR file from SBC  generate the call as video!!
>>
>> Any hint how to consider the call as voice only and ignore the INVITE
>> message codecs?
>>
>> Regards,
>> Ahmed Omer
>> Sent from my iPad
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> This is the SIP Forum discussion mailing list
>> TO UNSUBSCRIBE, or edit your delivery options, please visit
>> http://sipforum.org/mailman/listinfo/discussion
>> Post to the list at discussion at sipforum.org
>>
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> This is the SIP Forum discussion mailing list
> TO UNSUBSCRIBE, or edit your delivery options, please visit
> http://sipforum.org/mailman/listinfo/discussion
> Post to the list at discussion at sipforum.org
>
>


-- 
Thanks & Regards

Mithilesh Kumar
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://sipforum.org/pipermail/discussion/attachments/20111222/882f790b/attachment.html 


More information about the discussion mailing list