[SIPForum-discussion] Is it possible to send multiple invite messages to UAS.How

Amit Limaye amitonvoip at yahoo.co.in
Fri Aug 5 17:51:42 UTC 2011


essage Body 
Hi   
An end point can not send mutiple invites to sip servers/end point 
and forking proxy does so by spraying the Invite to various end points call mutiparty invite  
Practically a phone has only one communication line available to serve  a extension 
 
Any other Inputs ..? 
regards
Amit Limaye 


From: tester voip <tester.voip1 at gmail.com>
To: Uday Kiran <mudaykiran81 at gmail.com>
Cc: discussion at sipforum.org
Sent: Thursday, 4 August 2011 10:19 AM
Subject: Re: [SIPForum-discussion] Is it possible to send multiple invite messages to UAS.How


simultaneously I dont think it is possible. 
Just imagine how is it possible to send multiple calls from ur phone/client at the same time.

 
On Thu, Aug 4, 2011 at 7:45 PM, Uday Kiran <mudaykiran81 at gmail.com> wrote:

Yes 
>      It is possible to send invite to one UAC To multiple UAS .tell me how 
> 
>
>
>
>
> 
>On Thu, Aug 4, 2011 at 7:40 PM, tester voip <tester.voip1 at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>Do u mean to say from one UAC to UAS multiple INVITE simultaneously?
>>
>>
>> 
>>On Thu, Aug 4, 2011 at 10:10 AM, Uday Kiran <mudaykiran81 at gmail.com> wrote:
>> 
>> 
>>>Hi, 
>>>     Is it possible to send multiple invite messages to UAS.How 
>>>
>>> 
>>>Thanks, 
>>>Uday
>>>_______________________________________________
>>>This is the SIP Forum discussion mailing list
>>>TO UNSUBSCRIBE, or edit your delivery options, please visit http://sipforum.org/mailman/listinfo/discussion
>>>Post to the list at discussion at sipforum.org
>>>
>>>
>>
>

_______________________________________________
This is the SIP Forum discussion mailing list
TO UNSUBSCRIBE, or edit your delivery options, please visit http://sipforum.org/mailman/listinfo/discussion
Post to the list at discussion at sipforum.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://sipforum.org/pipermail/discussion/attachments/20110805/f1dddc69/attachment-0002.html>


More information about the discussion mailing list