[SIPForum-discussion] Is it possible to send multiple invite messages to UAS.How

Gopalakrishnan A.N saigop at gmail.com
Mon Aug 8 10:12:34 UTC 2011


I think multiple request is possible, let assume that you have eyebeam
softphone, you can register to multiple VoIP servers, also it has 6 lines,
in this case from the first line you can reach one server, and holding that
you can reach other server from the second line, like wise you can reach
about 6 lines.

please correct me if i am wrong.


On Thu, Aug 4, 2011 at 7:49 PM, tester voip <tester.voip1 at gmail.com> wrote:

> simultaneously I dont think it is possible.
> Just imagine how is it possible to send multiple calls from ur phone/client
> at the same time.
>
> On Thu, Aug 4, 2011 at 7:45 PM, Uday Kiran <mudaykiran81 at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Yes
>>       It is possible to send invite to one UAC To multiple UAS .tell me
>> how
>>
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Aug 4, 2011 at 7:40 PM, tester voip <tester.voip1 at gmail.com>wrote:
>>
>>> Do u mean to say from one UAC to UAS multiple INVITE simultaneously?
>>>
>>>   On Thu, Aug 4, 2011 at 10:10 AM, Uday Kiran <mudaykiran81 at gmail.com>wrote:
>>>
>>>>  Hi,
>>>>      Is it possible to send multiple invite messages to UAS.How
>>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>> Uday
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> This is the SIP Forum discussion mailing list
>>>> TO UNSUBSCRIBE, or edit your delivery options, please visit
>>>> http://sipforum.org/mailman/listinfo/discussion
>>>> Post to the list at discussion at sipforum.org
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> This is the SIP Forum discussion mailing list
> TO UNSUBSCRIBE, or edit your delivery options, please visit
> http://sipforum.org/mailman/listinfo/discussion
> Post to the list at discussion at sipforum.org
>
>


-- 
Thank you  with regards,
Gopalakrishnan A.N.
VoIP call - sip:saigop at gtalk2voip.com
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://sipforum.org/pipermail/discussion/attachments/20110808/7e3987d0/attachment.html 


More information about the discussion mailing list