[SIPForum-discussion] Remote Party ID need in From Header

Sijit Nair sijit.nair at gmail.com
Tue May 18 19:00:12 UTC 2010


Hi Friend

We are using nextone SBC at our end and we are getting a new customer who
need RPDI to be displayed at the last mile (means From CPN need to be
replaced with RPDI). We have tried different setting related to Privacy ,but
look like no setting are working.

The Trace is below

INVITE sip:+18138706251 at 10.28.8.254 <sip%3A%2B18138706251 at 10.28.8.254>SIP/2.0
Call-ID: 1376797673-464157226 at 10.8.8.35
Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 10.8.2.11:5060
;branch=z9hG4bK42abd8f8ba28abafa7e89-880bfa1b-692efc82
Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 10.8.8.35:5070
;branch=z9hG4bK0A080823BADF00D00000122593F7FAE178209233
Via: SIP/2.0/UDP app.ubiquitysoftware.com
;branch=z9hG4bK0A080823BADF00D00000122593F7FAE
From: <sip:8506432118 at 10.8.2.11 <sip%3A8506432118 at 10.8.2.11>
>;tag=-1092480392.1.kaiaiadcdelkijlfkgknhdko
To: <sip:+18138706251 at 10.28.8.254 <sip%3A%2B18138706251 at 10.28.8.254>>
CSeq: 1 INVITE
Contact: sip:8506432118 at 10.8.2.11:5060
x-scn-sii-serviceURI:
scnapp:OperSvcs-R2/vpCurrent/SCNOperSvcs-4.1.sar/587728906/5/1250197781356/1024165169/1
x-scn-notify-soap: http://10.8.8.30:6060/SCNAlertRouter/AlertRouter/
x-scn-cfd-settings: warn
x-scn-sii-confId: os1247040806869
Remote-Party-ID: "FL
Correctional"<sip:8663164146 at scn.securustech.net<sip%3A8663164146 at scn.securustech.net>
>;party=calling;id-type=subscriber;privacy=off;screen=yes
X-SCN-RouteTag: SECURUS-COLLECT
Max-Forwards: 69
Record-Route: <sip:10.8.2.11:5060;lr>
Content-Type: application/sdp
Content-Length: 251
v=0
o=- 18724869 18724869 IN IP4 as-cms6k01-slot4.allen.scn.securustech.net
s=media server session
t=0 0
m=audio 32794 RTP/AVP 0 101
c=IN IP4 10.8.10.96
a=rtpmap:0 PCMU/8000
a=rtpmap:101 telephone-event/8000
a=fmtp:101 0-15,32,36
a=sendrecv

Looking for some advise form you all.


Regards

Sijit Nair
91-9823390908
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://sipforum.org/pipermail/discussion/attachments/20100518/c5cb9048/attachment-0002.html>


More information about the discussion mailing list