[SIPForum-discussion] Request URI in case of tel uri registration

[Barry Weiss]

As far as the hosted platform that my company provides which uses Broadsoft
doesn't require tel:URI in the Request URI. Also off hand I don't believe
RFC 3261 requires that the register Request URI needs to have "tel:URI" in
it. This is part of the register request-line from the invite packet from my
soft phone to my sip account.

REGISTER sip:commpartners.us SIP/2.0

Perhaps, it depends on the platform you are on. Hope that helps a little.

Barry



On Tue, Jul 6, 2010 at 6:41 AM, Ashutosh Panda <ashubdk at gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi All,
>
> This is a question regarding implementation of tel uri in a REGISTER
> message.
> Whether the uri should contain only the 'URI' in SIP REGISTER or it should
> contain "tel:URI" as the Request URI.
>
> Please confirm which of these two syntax are correct.
>
> - Request-Line: REGISTER * tel:ims118.aaa.net* SIP/2.0
>
> OR
>
> - Request-Line: REGISTER * ims118.aaa.net* SIP/2.0
>
>
> Thanks
>
> Ashutosh
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> This is the SIP Forum discussion mailing list
> TO UNSUBSCRIBE, or edit your delivery options, please visit
> http://sipforum.org/mailman/listinfo/discussion
> Post to the list at discussion at sipforum.org
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://sipforum.org/pipermail/discussion/attachments/20100706/ed7fa001/attachment-0002.html>