[SIPForum-discussion] Query for Time T4

Murali Vuppandla mvuppand at cisco.com
Wed Jan 20 04:56:29 UTC 2010


Yes. I agree with Srinivas. It will ignore the ACK request .

 

And ACK is the only req. in SIP that doesn't expect any response. 

 

Regards,

Murali.

 

From: discussion-bounces at sipforum.org
[mailto:discussion-bounces at sipforum.org] On Behalf Of
srinivas.banda at wipro.com
Sent: Tuesday, January 19, 2010 6:02 PM
To: vijay11tiwari at gmail.com; lakhan.p at gmail.com
Cc: discussion at sipforum.org
Subject: Re: [SIPForum-discussion] Query for Time T4

 

Hi All,

 

I don't think so you will get 481 message for the re-transmited ACK, because
the side B doesn't match the the ACK with existing dialog/transaction it has
to ignore the ACK. Because side A doesn't expect any response to ACK
message. Only INVITE/OPTIONS/UPDATE/BYE/INFO methods will expects a
response.

ACK never expects the response.

 

Regards

Srinivas

 

  _____  

From: discussion-bounces at sipforum.org
[mailto:discussion-bounces at sipforum.org] On Behalf Of Vijay Tiwari
Sent: Saturday, January 09, 2010 4:16 PM
To: lakhan patel
Cc: discussion at sipforum.org
Subject: Re: [SIPForum-discussion] Query for Time T4

Hello Lakhan

 

it can not be 408. it should be 481 Call leg does not exist and if its reply
481 Call leg does not exist then its okay. 

 

And in  sip response: number have signification not words. if i config like
that 

200 failed "it means call success not failed." 

 

Thanks

Vijay

 

On Fri, Jan 8, 2010 at 11:13 AM, lakhan patel <lakhan.p at gmail.com> wrote:

Hi All,

I have doubt about T4 Timer and what happen if any dialog is in terminated
state and other side tries to communicate with previous dialog which was
terminated?

After INVTE from A to B, B sends 404 Not found and B received ACk for 404
but when A-side receive 404 and send ACK for 404 Call goes in Confirm state
and after 5second(T4 timer fires) it goes under Terminated state and after
that if we are sending Re-send ACK for 404 it should reply with 408 Call leg
does not exist.

Can Any body tell me is it correct call flow or not?




-- 
Thanks & Regards
Shivlakhan Patel
Email: lakhan.p at gmail.com, lakhan.p at hotmail.com 
IBM India Private Ltd. Bangalore
Contact: +91-9902791177

_______________________________________________
This is the SIP Forum discussion mailing list
TO UNSUBSCRIBE, or edit your delivery options, please visit
http://sipforum.org/mailman/listinfo/discussion
Post to the list at discussion at sipforum.org




-- 
They can because they think they can.

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://sipforum.org/pipermail/discussion/attachments/20100120/c3c63a3e/attachment-0002.html>


More information about the discussion mailing list