[SIPForum-discussion] Would the fax call fail if there is a mistmatch between SDP Attributes

[mustafa aydin]

Kevin&Maciej,

Thanks a lot for your help.

Macijec, I believe that the receiving gw is sending the second re-invite since 
it changes it`s SDP info (I dont know why but it is removing one of the fax 
atribute ), in any case it should be a normal behaviour. As Kevin indicated, it 
seems  that there is a bad implementation at the emitting side (sending image 
port with "0" to second invite.)

Again, thank u so much guys.

Regards,
Mustafa Aydin





________________________________
From: Maciej Wasiel <Maciej.Wasiel at dialogic.com>
To: mustafa aydin <mustafaydin82 at yahoo.com>; "discussion at sipforum.org" 
<discussion at sipforum.org>
Sent: Wed, August 25, 2010 10:16:40 PM
Subject: RE: [SIPForum-discussion] Would the fax call fail if there is a 
mistmatch between SDP Attributes


Hi Mustafa,
I have no idea why the second re-invite is generated by the receiving gateway. 
Looks like you might be dealing here with a bad implementation.
Maciej Wasiel
 
From:mustafa aydin [mailto:mustafaydin82 at yahoo.com] 
Sent: Wednesday, August 25, 2010 3:29 AM
To: Maciej Wasiel; discussion at sipforum.org
Subject: Re: [SIPForum-discussion] Would the fax call fail if there is a 
mistmatch between SDP Attributes
 
Hi Maciej,
 
Receiving gw is advertising udptl as per the section from the re-invite message 
below;

Media Description, name and address (m): image 52392 udptl t38
Media Type: image
Media Port: 52392
Media Proto: udptl
Media Format: t38
 
I do not know the brands of gws which are involving to the scenario. But the 
call is between PBX (emmiting side) and CO (receiving side).
 
 
Regards,
Mustafa Aydin

________________________________

From:Maciej Wasiel <Maciej.Wasiel at dialogic.com>
To: mustafa aydin <mustafaydin82 at yahoo.com>; "discussion at sipforum.org" 
<discussion at sipforum.org>
Sent: Tue, August 24, 2010 10:47:25 PM
Subject: RE: [SIPForum-discussion] Would the fax call fail if there is a 
mistmatch between SDP Attributes
Hi Mustafa,
Is the receiving gateway advertising tcp and udptl? Btw, do you know which 
gateways are used in this call?
 
Maciej
 
 
From:discussion-bounces at sipforum.org [mailto:discussion-bounces at sipforum.org] On 
Behalf Of mustafa aydin
Sent: Tuesday, August 24, 2010 8:28 AM
To: discussion at sipforum.org
Subject: [SIPForum-discussion] Would the fax call fail if there is a mistmatch 
between SDP Attributes
 
Hello Guys,
 
In my scenario, the receiving gateway sends a reinvite (to negotiate t38) with 
the following SDP attributes;
 
Media Attribute (a): T38FaxVersion:0
Media Attribute (a): T38FaxMaxBuffer:1100
Media Attribute (a): T38FaxMaxDatagram:612
Media Attribute (a): T38MaxBitRate:14400
Media Attribute (a): T38FaxRateManagement:transferredTCF
Media Attribute (a): T38FaxUdpEC:t38UDPRedundancy
 
However, the emitting  gateway responds only with the  attributes below in 200 
OK;
 
Media Attribute (a): T38FaxRateManagement:transferredTCF
Media Attribute (a): T38MaxBitRate:14400
 
Then the recieving gateway sends another reinvite with removing the 
"T38FaxUdpEC:t38UDPRedundancy" attribute, but this time the emitting gw responds 
with a 200 which has "0" at it`s image port.
 
My questions are; whether the mismatch between these attributes is a reason for 
a failure ? If so, should not  the emitting gw respond back with a failure 
message instead of a 200 OK ?  

 
"draft-mule-sip-t38callflows-02.txt" indicates that only T38FaxMaxBuffer  and 
T38FaxMaxDatagram are optional, does it mean that all other attributes must 
reside at the SDP ? 

 
Best Regards,
Mustafa Aydin


      
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://sipforum.org/pipermail/discussion/attachments/20100825/5c30d22c/attachment-0002.html>