[SIPForum-discussion] Would the fax call fail if there is a mistmatch between SDP Attributes

[Maciej Wasiel]

Hi Mustafa,
Is the receiving gateway advertising tcp and udptl? Btw, do you know which gateways are used in this call?

Maciej


From: discussion-bounces at sipforum.org [mailto:discussion-bounces at sipforum.org] On Behalf Of mustafa aydin
Sent: Tuesday, August 24, 2010 8:28 AM
To: discussion at sipforum.org
Subject: [SIPForum-discussion] Would the fax call fail if there is a mistmatch between SDP Attributes

Hello Guys,

In my scenario, the receiving gateway sends a reinvite (to negotiate t38) with the following SDP attributes;

Media Attribute (a): T38FaxVersion:0
Media Attribute (a): T38FaxMaxBuffer:1100
Media Attribute (a): T38FaxMaxDatagram:612
Media Attribute (a): T38MaxBitRate:14400
Media Attribute (a): T38FaxRateManagement:transferredTCF
Media Attribute (a): T38FaxUdpEC:t38UDPRedundancy

However, the emitting  gateway responds only with the  attributes below in 200 OK;

Media Attribute (a): T38FaxRateManagement:transferredTCF
Media Attribute (a): T38MaxBitRate:14400

Then the recieving gateway sends another reinvite with removing the "T38FaxUdpEC:t38UDPRedundancy" attribute, but this time the emitting gw responds with a 200 which has "0" at it`s image port.

My questions are; whether the mismatch between these attributes is a reason for a failure ? If so, should not  the emitting gw respond back with a failure message instead of a 200 OK ?

"draft-mule-sip-t38callflows-02.txt" indicates that only T38FaxMaxBuffer  and T38FaxMaxDatagram are optional, does it mean that all other attributes must reside at the SDP ?

Best Regards,
Mustafa Aydin

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://sipforum.org/pipermail/discussion/attachments/20100824/6c8d5339/attachment-0002.html>