[SIPForum-discussion] 3GPP IMS Signaling flows for Release 6 and R7

[DEEPAK SHARMA]

Sorry but this TS does not contains the End To End QoS Call Flows.

On Mon, Nov 2, 2009 at 11:29 PM, ABHIJIT <abhijitrout at gmail.com> wrote:

> here is the correct link...
>
>
> http://www.3gpp.org/ftp/Specs/html-info/23228.htm
>
> On Tue, Nov 3, 2009 at 10:46 AM, Sriram Subramanian <sriram.ngn at gmail.com>wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>         Can you try TS 23.228
>>
>> http://www.3gpp.org/ftp/Specs/html-info/23228.html
>>
>> Regards,
>> Sriram
>>
>> On Thu, Oct 29, 2009 at 4:02 PM, DEEPAK SHARMA <deepaksharma06 at gmail.com>wrote:
>>
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> I am looking for 3GPP technical Specification for IMS Signaling Flows
>>> implemented for Release 6 and 7.
>>> 24.228 is the base document for IMS signaling flow but there is no
>>> updated version of this TS fro R6 and R7.
>>>
>>> I need to find Signaling Flows for *"**End-to-End QoS and signalling
>>> call flows interactions"* covering signaling flows for *Policy Control
>>> with IP-CAN sessions.*
>>>
>>> In R6, IMS Node PDF is separated from P-CSCF to an external entity. I
>>> need to find End-to-End signaling Flows for Policy control over Gq
>>> interface.
>>>
>>> It will be really thankful if some can provide me this information.
>>>
>>> --
>>> Thanks
>>> Deepak Sharma
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> This is the SIP Forum discussion mailing list
>>> TO UNSUBSCRIBE, or edit your delivery options, please visit
>>> http://sipforum.org/mailman/listinfo/discussion
>>> Post to the list at discussion at sipforum.org
>>>
>>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> This is the SIP Forum discussion mailing list
>> TO UNSUBSCRIBE, or edit your delivery options, please visit
>> http://sipforum.org/mailman/listinfo/discussion
>> Post to the list at discussion at sipforum.org
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> Thanks,
>
> Abhijit
>



-- 
Thanks
Deepak Sharma
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://sipforum.org/pipermail/discussion/attachments/20091103/2a9a68aa/attachment-0002.html>