[SIPForum-discussion] bad request from a re-INVITE

[Tomasz Zieleniewski]

Hi,

When there is re-INVITE which is send within a dialog the non-2xx
response should the current ongoing session related to this dialog do not
change.
Was there any active session established before the re-INVITE was sent?

In case of "400 Bad request" response UAS informs UAC that request it
received had  bad syntax (some header missing or not well formed).
There should be a Reason-Phrase header in the response which provides
human readable short description of the problem. Try to look for it.

Kind regards,
- Tomasz Zieleniewski

ps. would be helpful if You provide some network traces


2009/5/12 Garron, James <jgarron at sonusnet.com>

>  Can you provide the re-INVITE?
>
>
>  ------------------------------
>
> *From:* discussion-bounces at sipforum.org [mailto:
> discussion-bounces at sipforum.org] *On Behalf Of *warr
> *Sent:* Tuesday, May 12, 2009 4:17 AM
> *To:* discussion at sipforum.org
> *Subject:* [SIPForum-discussion] bad request from a re-INVITE
>
>
>
> Hi to all,
>
>
>
> I have a scenario where when a re-INVITE is received, there is no speech
> path established and a BAD REQUEST response is generated by the UAS. What is
> the possible cause for this?
>
>
>
> Thanks in advance!
>
>
> Regards,
>
> Warren
>
>
>
> --
>
> Bernard Baruch<http://www.brainyquote.com/quotes/authors/b/bernard_baruch.html> - "Vote for the man who promises least; he'll be the least disappointing."
>
> _______________________________________________
> This is the SIP Forum discussion mailing list
> TO UNSUBSCRIBE, or edit your delivery options, please visit
> http://sipforum.org/mailman/listinfo/discussion
> Post to the list at discussion at sipforum.org
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://sipforum.org/pipermail/discussion/attachments/20090515/7c995bfb/attachment-0002.html>