[SIPForum-discussion] Using UPDATE for call transfers
Victor Pascual Avila
victor.pascual.avila at gmail.com
Sun Jun 28 07:35:43 UTC 2009
On Fri, Jun 26, 2009 at 2:55 PM, Richard<dude at mr.net> wrote:
> Caller A (UAC) connects a caller B's via UAS which caller B has call
> forwarded to Caller C. The UAS sends a new INVITE to Caller A, Call A
> replies with 100 Trying and 180 ringing (SDP profile), UAS replies with a
> PRACK and 200 OK, Then Caller A sends another 180 ringing (SDP profile),
> Then Caller A sends an UPDATE (SDP profile) changing the Media port, The UAS
> then sends 504 Server timeout.
>
> Shouldn't the UAC (Caller A) do a RE-INVITE instead of an UPDATE? RFC 3311
> section 5.1 recommends sending a re-INVITE instead of an UPDATE.
>
> My question is should UAC conform to this standard or is it grey area as
> it's "recommended?"
>
> Much Thanks!
I'd recommend taking a look at RFC5589 (Call Transfer)
Cheers,
--
Victor Pascual Ávila
More information about the discussion
mailing list