[SIPForum-discussion] How SIP call can be diffrentiated basedon Class4 and Class5 switch calls

Garrity, John N. (Infrastructure Solutions Dept.) john.garrity at thehartford.com
Wed Dec 2 14:09:13 UTC 2009


If you are willing to take the time you can establish a local dialing
area list and compare the caller ID to the list to establish local Class
5 or Long Distance Class 4. 

________________________________

From: discussion-bounces at sipforum.org
[mailto:discussion-bounces at sipforum.org] On Behalf Of Eric Burger
Sent: Wednesday, December 02, 2009 6:58 AM
To: kshitij.bhushan at gmail.com
Cc: discussion at sipforum.org
Subject: Re: [SIPForum-discussion] How SIP call can be diffrentiated
basedon Class4 and Class5 switch calls


In SIP there is no distinction -- Class n was about the PSTN routing
hierarchy. SIP uses an entirely different (flat) routing model. 

On Dec 1, 2009, at 7:00 AM, Kshitij Bhushan wrote:


	Hi All,
	 
	One basic question?
	 
	How we are distinguishing the class4 and class5 switch call in
SIP?Is through NOA or some access layer or something else.
	 
	Pls reply!!!!
	 
	Thanks in advance.
	Kshitij.
	 
	_______________________________________________
	This is the SIP Forum discussion mailing list
	TO UNSUBSCRIBE, or edit your delivery options, please visit
http://sipforum.org/mailman/listinfo/discussion
	Post to the list at discussion at sipforum.org
	


************************************************************
This communication, including attachments, is for the exclusive use of addressee and may contain proprietary, confidential and/or privileged information.  If you are not the intended recipient, any use, copying, disclosure, dissemination or distribution is strictly prohibited.  If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail, delete this communication and destroy all copies.
************************************************************
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://sipforum.org/pipermail/discussion/attachments/20091202/2d1c1bdd/attachment-0002.html>


More information about the discussion mailing list