[SIPForum-discussion] Regarding To-Tag in 180 Ringing
Raj Jain
rj2807 at gmail.com
Thu Oct 23 21:48:44 UTC 2008
It is not optional for non-100 provisional responses. Here is a quote
from section 8.2.6.2 of RFC 3261
If a request contained a To tag in the request, the To header field
in the response MUST equal that of the request. However, if the To
header field in the request did not contain a tag, the URI in the To
header field in the response MUST equal the URI in the To header
field; additionally, the UAS MUST add a tag to the To header field in
the response (with the exception of the 100 (Trying) response, in
which a tag MAY be present). This serves to identify the UAS that is
responding, possibly resulting in a component of a dialog ID. The
same tag MUST be used for all responses to that request, both final
and provisional (again excepting the 100 (Trying)). Procedures for
the generation of tags are defined in Section 19.3.
On Thu, Oct 23, 2008 at 12:57 PM, saraswati sp <saraswatisp at gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> Is generation of To-Tag Mandatory/Optional in 180 provisional response??
>
> If Optional, then under which condition is it generated??
>
> Thanks in advance.
>
> Regards,
> Saras.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> This is the SIP Forum discussion mailing list
> TO UNSUBSCRIBE, or edit your delivery options, please visit
> http://sipforum.org/mailman/listinfo/discussion
> Post to the list at discussion at sipforum.org
>
>
More information about the discussion
mailing list