[SIPForum-discussion] HELP

Donald Lee baolovebao at gmail.com
Mon May 19 09:19:54 UTC 2008


Please notice that the two "Via" here have the same branch ID. I just want
to know if this valid?

Thanks.


On 5/19/08, 杨伟 <shyw13 at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> 2008/5/16, Bob Penfield <BPenfield at acmepacket.com>:
>>
>>
>> Either format is valid. Like may SIP header, the Via can contain multiple
>> values separated by commas. Note however if it is on multiple lines,
>> then the second line must begin with at least one space so it is seen as a
>> contnuation line.
>>
>> *Via: SIP/2.0/UDP **server10.biloxi.com* <http://server10.biloxi.com/>*
>> ;branch=z9hG4bK776asdhds;received=**192.0.2.1* <http://192.0.2.1/>*
>> ,<CR><LF>*
>> *<SP>SIP/2.0/UDP server11.biloxi.com;branch=z9hG2fdK776asdhds;received=
>> 192.0.2.2*
>> **
>>
>
> If I wrote it in this form:
>  *Via: SIP/2.0/UDP **server10.biloxi.com* <http://server10.biloxi.com/>*
> ;branch=z9hG4bK776asdhds;received=**192.0.2.1* <http://192.0.2.1/>*
> ,<CR><LF>*
> *Via: SIP/2.0/UDP server11.biloxi.com;branch=z9hG2fdK776asdhds;received=
> 192.0.2.2*
> **
> Is it identical with yours?
>
>
>
>> **
>> cheers,
>> (-:bob
>>
>>  ------------------------------
>> *From:* discussion-bounces at sipforum.org [discussion-bounces at sipforum.org]
>> On Behalf Of Niketa Pal [pal.niketa at gmail.com]
>> *Sent:* Friday, May 16, 2008 2:11 AM
>> *To:* Ganesh Bhattathiri
>> *Cc:* discussion at sipforum.org
>> *Subject:* Re: [SIPForum-discussion] HELP
>>
>>
>>  Hi Ganesh,
>>
>> The second format is right, mentioning two 'Via' headers. First format is
>> wrong. Stack would give parsing error if first format is used.
>>
>> Regards,
>> Niketa
>>
>> On Fri, May 16, 2008 at 11:22 AM, Ganesh Bhattathiri <
>> ganesh_bhattathiri at persistent.co.in> wrote:
>>
>>>  *Hi everyone,*
>>>
>>> **
>>>
>>> *Sorry to trouble again, I wanted to know if there are multiple via
>>> headers in a sip request could the header be written in the following
>>> manner?*
>>>
>>> **
>>>
>>> *" Via: SIP/2.0/UDP server10.biloxi.com
>>> ;branch=z9hG4bK776asdhds;received=192.0.2.1, *
>>>
>>> *SIP/2.0/UDP server11.biloxi.com;branch=z9hG2fdK776asdhds;received=
>>> 192.0.2.2** "*
>>>
>>> **
>>>
>>> *Or do we write  it as,*
>>>
>>> **
>>>
>>> *" Via: SIP/2.0/UDP server10.biloxi.com
>>> ;branch=z9hG4bK776asdhds;received=192.0.2.1 *
>>>
>>> *   Via: SIP/2.0/UDP server11.biloxi.com
>>> ;branch=z9hG2fdK776asdhds;received=192.0.2.2** "*
>>>
>>> **
>>>
>>> *And if it is the later then is the first header format wrong? Or is it
>>> possible to write the header in that format?*
>>>
>>> **
>>>
>>> *Awaiting reply.*
>>>
>>> **
>>>
>>> *Thanks in advance*
>>>
>>> **
>>>
>>> *Ganesh*
>>>
>>> **
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> This is the SIP Forum discussion mailing list
>>> TO UNSUBSCRIBE, or edit your delivery options, please visit
>>> http://sipforum.org/mailman/listinfo/discussion
>>> Post to the list at discussion at sipforum.org
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> This is the SIP Forum discussion mailing list
>> TO UNSUBSCRIBE, or edit your delivery options, please visit
>> http://sipforum.org/mailman/listinfo/discussion
>> Post to the list at discussion at sipforum.org
>>
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> This is the SIP Forum discussion mailing list
> TO UNSUBSCRIBE, or edit your delivery options, please visit
> http://sipforum.org/mailman/listinfo/discussion
> Post to the list at discussion at sipforum.org
>
>


-- 
BR
Donald
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://sipforum.org/pipermail/discussion/attachments/20080519/fb1733de/attachment-0008.html>


More information about the discussion mailing list