[SIPForum-discussion] HELP

Niketa Pal pal.niketa at gmail.com
Fri May 16 06:11:18 UTC 2008


Hi Ganesh,

The second format is right, mentioning two 'Via' headers. First format is
wrong. Stack would give parsing error if first format is used.

Regards,
Niketa

On Fri, May 16, 2008 at 11:22 AM, Ganesh Bhattathiri <
ganesh_bhattathiri at persistent.co.in> wrote:

>  *Hi everyone,*
>
> * *
>
> *Sorry to trouble again, I wanted to know if there are multiple via
> headers in a sip request could the header be written in the following
> manner?*
>
> * *
>
> *" Via: SIP/2.0/UDP server10.biloxi.com;branch=z9hG4bK776asdhds;received=
> 192.0.2.1, *
>
> *SIP/2.0/UDP server11.biloxi.com;branch=z9hG2fdK776asdhds;received=
> 192.0.2.2** "*
>
> * *
>
> *Or do we write  it as,*
>
> * *
>
> *" Via: SIP/2.0/UDP server10.biloxi.com;branch=z9hG4bK776asdhds;received=
> 192.0.2.1 *
>
> *   Via: SIP/2.0/UDP server11.biloxi.com
> ;branch=z9hG2fdK776asdhds;received=192.0.2.2** "*
>
> * *
>
> *And if it is the later then is the first header format wrong? Or is it
> possible to write the header in that format?*
>
> * *
>
> *Awaiting reply.*
>
> * *
>
> *Thanks in advance*
>
> * *
>
> *Ganesh*
>
> * *
>
> _______________________________________________
> This is the SIP Forum discussion mailing list
> TO UNSUBSCRIBE, or edit your delivery options, please visit
> http://sipforum.org/mailman/listinfo/discussion
> Post to the list at discussion at sipforum.org
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://sipforum.org/pipermail/discussion/attachments/20080516/3598a54c/attachment-0002.html>


More information about the discussion mailing list