[SIPForum-discussion] Fw: Re: Bye request

[khalikh uddin]

--- On Sat, 6/7/08, khalikh uddin <khalikh at yahoo.com> wrote:
From: khalikh uddin <khalikh at yahoo.com>
Subject: Re: [SIPForum-discussion] Bye request
To: "mjhorse" <mjhorse at qq.com>
Date: Saturday, June 7, 2008, 3:31 AM

hai 

BYE request is always end-to-end.It is never send by proxy.thats why it
should not be hop-by-hop.i think proxy and UAS's can insert record
route header field in invite. in this case the contact header field in
respose(say 200 ok) ot INVITE req will not be used to route this
response.Response will be routed through same set of proxys

--- On Thu, 4/24/08, mjhorse <mjhorse at qq.com> wrote:
From: mjhorse <mjhorse at qq.com>
Subject: Re: [SIPForum-discussion] Bye request
To: "mwilliam prusty" <callwilliam90653 at rediffmail.com>, "discussion" <discussion at sipforum.org>
Date: Thursday, April 24, 2008, 3:26 AM

Hi
In my point of view, BYE will always be hop-by-hop regardless
whether Route-Record is inserted in INVITE or under other conditions.
 
 
------------------

by mj
 
 
------------------ Original ------------------

From:  "mwilliam prusty"<callwilliam90653 at rediffmail.com>;
Date:  Thu, Apr 24, 2008 02:40 PM
To:  "discussion"<discussion at sipforum.org>; 

Subject:  [SIPForum-discussion] Bye request
 

 
Hi 

Can any one tell , if proxy Inserts Recordroute
header field in the invite request  of a call , In this case the
BYE request will be Hop by hop or End to End.



Regards
William 





_______________________________________________
This is the SIP Forum discussion mailing list
TO UNSUBSCRIBE, or edit your delivery options, please visit
http://sipforum.org/mailman/listinfo/discussion
Post to the list at discussion at sipforum.org




      


      
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://sipforum.org/pipermail/discussion/attachments/20080607/c3eb2b43/attachment-0002.html>