[SIPForum-discussion] Reliable Provisionable Response to the Re-Invite.

[Robert Sparks]

He's talking about RFC3262 responses (the kind that get PRACKed).

And yes, it is legal to respond to reINVITEs with reliable provisionals.

RjS

On Jan 3, 2008, at 7:07 AM, Halit Sakca wrote:

> Hi Alex,
>
> Would you mind if I ask you to explain a little more your question ?
> What do you mean with "reliable provisionable response" ? Could you  
> please give an example?
>
> thanks,
>
> Selamlar,
> Halit Sakca
>
>
>
> Date: Thu, 3 Jan 2008 15:52:49 +0800
> From: alexzhang at gdnt.com.cn
> To: discussion at sipforum.org
> Subject: [SIPForum-discussion] Reliable Provisionable Response to  
> the Re-Invite.
>
> Hi All,
>
> Can a reliable provisionable response be generated for the Re- 
> invite message?
> Thanks.
>
> Alex Zhang
> Guangdong Nortel (GDNT) R&D Center
> GSM/UMTS Voice Core - MSC Design
> Phone: (PSTN)+86 020 89188782 (ESN)6 554 8782
> E-mail: alexzhang at gdnt.com.cn Y! ahooIM: zcc_nuaa
>
>
>
> Tamamõyla yeni Windows Live Messenger ailesine katõl Buraya tõkla!
> _______________________________________________
> This is the SIP Forum discussion mailing list
> TO UNSUBSCRIBE, or edit your delivery options, please visit http:// 
> sipforum.org/mailman/listinfo/discussion
> Post to the list at discussion at sipforum.org

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://sipforum.org/pipermail/discussion/attachments/20080103/0a236970/attachment-0014.html>