[SIPForum-discussion] regarding syntax of integrity protected

[rupandeep singh]

Hi Radhashyam,
Thanks for ur reply but i consulted TS 24.229 earlier also, but in subclause 7.2A.2.1 of this TS it is written to consult RFC 2617 for more information.But in that RFC 2617 in section 1.2 the syntax of this parameter is given like this 

auth-param     = token "=" ( token | quoted-string )
   
and from my knowldge about BNF  this indicates that both   

integrity protected = no or integrity protected = "no"
both are correct .So Thats why im facing ambiguity between them.Please clearify this ambiguity.

Radhashyam Behera <radhashyambehera at gmail.com> wrote: Hi Rupandeep,
Please look into the sub clause 7.2A2 in 3GPP TS 24.229 V8.3.0 (2008-03).

Thanks & Regards,
Radhashyam




On 4/28/08, rupandeep singh  wrote:
> hi
> Can anybody tell what is the proper syntax of integrity protected
> is it integrity protected = no or integrity protected = "no" .
> I have consulted RFC 3261 as well as TS24.229 but everywhere it is not given properly,so could  anyone of u plz help me out.
>
> Thanks
> Rupandeep Singh
>
>
> ________________________________
Be a better friend, newshound, and know-it-all with Yahoo! Mobile. Try it now.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> This is the SIP Forum discussion mailing list
> TO UNSUBSCRIBE, or edit your delivery options, please visit http://sipforum.org/mailman/listinfo/discussion
> Post to the list at discussion at sipforum.org
>
>


       
---------------------------------
Be a better friend, newshound, and know-it-all with Yahoo! Mobile.  Try it now.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://sipforum.org/pipermail/discussion/attachments/20080428/17e7ae54/attachment-0002.html>