[SIPForum-discussion] discussion Digest, Vol 26, Issue 27

[Ngwenya Mfanasibili]

Thanks John. I'll ask the guy configuring the Quintum Gateway to check these
parameters. Thanks so much. 

-----Original Message-----
From: discussion-bounces at sipforum.org
[mailto:discussion-bounces at sipforum.org]On Behalf Of John S. Robinson
Sent: Tuesday, September 11, 2007 6:28 PM
To: discussion at sipforum.org
Subject: Re: [SIPForum-discussion] discussion Digest, Vol 26, Issue 27


Hello, Mfana

With regard to your question about not getting 180 Ringing from Quintum --
It sounds like there is a configuration problem on the Quintum.  The
controlling SIP Signaling Group in the Quintum Gateway can be configured to
send 180Ringing -- or not -- and to send 183Progress -- or not.  Here is a
snip from a Quintum SIP signaling group:  



SIPSignalingGroup-1 :
  
. . . . . 

  PrimarySIPServerPort         : 5060                portnumber,def 5060,
  PrimarySIPServer             : 192.168.10.11       IP address,         
  
. . . . . 

  AllowOnlyProxyCalls          : 0                   all calls,          
  SDPin180Ringing              : 1                   send SDP,           
  SIPServerInFromHdr           : 1                   use SIP Server IP,  
  SDPin183Progress             : 1                   yes,default,        
  IncludeQuintumHeader         : 0                   disable,            
  UserNameInContact            : 1                   contact info sent,  
  RequestReTransmitCount       : 3                   default 11,         
  UserNameAsURI                : 0                   disable,default,    
  MaxForwards                  : 70                  default 70,         
  PRACKMethod                  : 0                   disabled,           
  Send180Ringing               : 1                   enabled,            
  Send183Progress              : 0                   disabled,           
  SipPstnInterworking          : 0                   disabled,           
  SIPNoConnectTimeout          : 180                 seconds,def 180,    
  SessionTimer                 : 0                   disabled,           


Check the items highlighted in blue above.  I think you will find that they
are not set as you want them.

Hope this helps,


John S. Robinson


          





   _____  



Subject: 
[SIPForum-discussion] Quintum Gateway not sending 180 Ringing

From: 
Ngwenya Mfanasibili  <mailto:NgwenyaM at sentech.co.za>
<NgwenyaM at sentech.co.za>

Date: 
Tue, 11 Sep 2007 14:14:01 +0200

To: 
"'discussion at sipforum.org'" <mailto:'discussion at sipforum.org'>
<mailto:discussion at sipforum.org> <discussion at sipforum.org>

To: 
"'discussion at sipforum.org'" <mailto:'discussion at sipforum.org'>
<mailto:discussion at sipforum.org> <discussion at sipforum.org>


Hi All, 

I am connecting from Verso (C4 and C5) platform to Quintum Gateway. I make a
call and do not get a ringback from Quintum Gateway. I took traces and they
show that after "100 Trying Message", it goes straight to "200 OK" or
sometimes to "183 Session Progress". I do not have access to the Quintum
Gateway as another person is doing the configuration on the other side. In a
nutshell, what causes a SIP Server not to send a "180 ringing message".

Regards 
Mfana 



DISCLAIMER: The content of the E-Mail, which may include one or more
attachments, is strictly confidential, and is intended solely for the use of
the named recipient(s). If you have received this E-Mail in error, you are
not permitted to and must not disclose, distribute, or retain it, and are
requested to please notify the sender immediately by return E-Mail and
delete it thereafter.

No Employee or intermediary is authorised to conclude a binding agreement on
behalf of Sentech LTD by E-Mail without express written confirmation by a
duly authorised representative of Sentech. The use or contents of this
E-Mail is intended for Sentech's business. If it is used for any other
purpose, the views expressed are those of the sender and no liability will
attach to Sentech.
	

   _____  





DISCLAIMER: The content of the E-Mail, which may include one or more attachments, is strictly confidential, and is intended solely for the use of the named recipient(s). If you have received this E-Mail in error, you are not permitted to and must not disclose, distribute, or retain it, and are requested to please notify the sender immediately by return E-Mail and delete it thereafter.

No Employee or intermediary is authorised to conclude a binding agreement on behalf of Sentech LTD by E-Mail without express written confirmation by a duly authorised representative of Sentech. The use or contents of this E-Mail is intended for Sentech's business. If it is used for any other purpose, the views expressed are those of the sender and no liability will attach to Sentech.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://sipforum.org/pipermail/discussion/attachments/20070912/08001b80/attachment-0002.html>