[SIPForum-discussion] specific case with a=inactive

[Joerg Scholz]

Thanks Badel and Robert 
for your responds. That's also what I expected to do - but it seems to be a
problem for that class 5 SIP server solution which I try to work with.
It uses the Re-invite without SDP to retrieve the hold call. Thereby the
retrieve is initiated with a user agent web application (not the phone). If
I send still:
A=inactive
In the SDP of the 200ok response of my device; it is used for the second leg
of the call as SDP content and the call will be reestablished without voice.

So I need exactly to know what the right behavior is in that case.

It is quite simple to change the behavior but I'm pretty sure that other
cases will have problem then.
Thanks again and best regards
Joerg


-----Original Message-----
From: badal naik [mailto:kunusan at yahoo.com] 
Sent: Tuesday, October 02, 2007 10:41 AM
To: Traussnig Robert; Joerg Scholz; discussion at sipforum.org
Subject: Re: [SIPForum-discussion] specific case with a=inactive

Well,
I think in your scenario U have to add the SDP
parameter of the previous success(2**) reponse.
Re-Invite should work as follows in ur case:
When a UAC sends a re-invite with no session
description, in which case the first reliable
non-failure response to the re-invite will contain the
offer.

That is my understanding..

Thanks
Badal Naik
--- Traussnig Robert <robert.traussnig at kapsch.net>
wrote:

> Hi!
>  
> I'm not quite sure if this is correct but because of
> the fact that you
> didn't get a SDP in the Re-Invite you have to give
> an offer in your
> 200ok. So you have to decide if you send a=inactive
> again or a=sendrecv.
> Maybe someone have a better answer.
>  
> Best Regards,
> Robert
>  
> 
> -----Ursprungliche Nachricht-----
> Von: discussion-bounces at sipforum.org
> [mailto:discussion-bounces at sipforum.org]Im Auftrag
> von Joerg Scholz
> Gesendet: Montag, 01. Oktober 2007 18:58
> An: discussion at sipforum.org
> Betreff: [SIPForum-discussion] specific case with
> a=inactive
> 
> 
> 
> Hello everybody,
> 
> I have a quick question related to the SDP signaling
> behavior in a
> specific hold case. My scenario is the following:
> 
>  
> 
> Incoming Re-invite of an established voice call with
> the following
> content of SDP:
> 
>             c=IN IP4 0.0.0.0
> 
>             ...
> 
>             a=inactive
> 
>  
> 
> In the 200ok I confirm the attribute line:
> 
>             a=inactive
> 
>  
> 
> and the call is hold - everything ok. 
> 
> Later on comes another Re-invite without SDP for the
> same call. Now my
> question, if I answer in the 200ok for that
> Re-invite with SDP do I have
> to repeat also the: 
> 
>             a=inactive
> 
> attribute or do I send now my SDP again with 
> 
>             a=sendrecv
> 
>  
> 
> Thanks and Best regards
> 
> Joerg
> 
>  
> 
> > _______________________________________________
> This is the SIP Forum discussion mailing list
> TO UNSUBSCRIBE, or edit your delivery options,
> please visit
> http://sipforum.org/mailman/listinfo/discussion
> Post to the list at discussion at sipforum.org
> 



       
____________________________________________________________________________
________
Yahoo! oneSearch: Finally, mobile search 
that gives answers, not web links. 
http://mobile.yahoo.com/mobileweb/onesearch?refer=1ONXIC
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://sipforum.org/pipermail/discussion/attachments/20071002/d9a1f360/attachment-0002.html>