[SIPForum-discussion] How to implement a chat M2M
Deepanshu
deepanshu at huawei.com
Mon Mar 26 01:39:25 UTC 2007
You can use the concept defined in draft-ietf-sipping-capacity-attribute-03.txt.
Or
A Adhoc conference can be established by Client A and all other users can join in the conference. They can exchange the message using MSRP
HTH
Deepanshu Gautam
R&D Engineer
Huawei Technologies Co. Ltd.
Nanjing, PRC
----- Original Message -----
From: Francesco Paolo Landolfo
To: discussion at sipforum.org
Sent: Friday, March 23, 2007 6:59 PM
Subject: [SIPForum-discussion] How to implement a chat M2M
Hi,
I have implemented a chat P2P using SIP and the MESSAGE message.
Pratically, if Pippo want to send an instant message to Pluto, Pippo sends a MESSAGE to a Server, this Server convert the Pluto Sip Uri in Pluto Care of Address and send it to Pluto. This is in agreement with rfc3261.
Now I'd like to implement a chat M2M using SIP, but I have some doubt about flow and messages that I have to use.
I think that there is one possible scene:
a.. A client send a MESSAGE to a Server that dispatchs this message to all chat partecipant.
Now, how can I implement this feature?
Have someone some other idea?
Thanks,
Francesco
--
Ciò che facciamo in vita riecheggia nell'eternità...(Il Gladiatore)
"Noodles, cos'hai fatto in tutti questi anni?" " Sono andato a letto presto." (C'era una volta in America)
E adesso so cosa devo fare, devo continuare a respirare perché domani il sole sorgerà e chissà la marea cosa potrà portare. (Cast Away)
Il progresso! Sempre tardi arriva. (Nuovo Cinema Paradiso)
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
This is the SIP Forum discussion mailing list
TO UNSUBSCRIBE, or edit your delivery options, please visit http://sipforum.org/mailman/listinfo/discussion
Post to the list at discussion at sipforum.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://sipforum.org/pipermail/discussion/attachments/20070326/fd96a87e/attachment-0002.html>
More information about the discussion
mailing list