[SIPForum-discussion] CSeq count in call scenarios using PRACK and UPDATE Methods

Smitha Harish smithah at TechMahindra.com
Wed Feb 14 09:37:23 UTC 2007


Hi all,

I have a query on use of reliable Provisional Responses using the PRACK
Method.

In the call flow shown below between a UAC and UAS, if CSeq count is 2
in PRACK from UAC and CSeq is 1 in ACK from UAC, If a BYE gets initiated
from UAC itself, What count shall it hold in its Cseq? 2 (Base on INVITE
Cseq count) or 3(Based on PRACK Cseq count). Kindly clarify?

 

 

If an UPDATE is sent by the UAC before a 200 OK response for the INVITE
has been received in order to modify the session parameters in the
pending session, what is the CSeq count? Does it get incremented by 1 at
the UAC. If so does it take PRACK Cseq count as its previous count or
INVITE Cseq as its previous count?Kindly clarify?

 

Thanks in anticipation,

Smitha.H

 



============================================================================================================================

Tech Mahindra, formerly Mahindra-British Telecom.
 
Disclaimer:

This message and the information contained herein is proprietary and confidential and subject to the Tech Mahindra policy statement, you may review at <a href="http://www.techmahindra.com/Disclaimer.html">http://www.techmahindra.com/Disclaimer.html</a> externally and <a href="http://tim.techmahindra.com/Disclaimer.html">http://tim.techmahindra.com/Disclaimer.html</a> internally within Tech Mahindra.

============================================================================================================================
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://sipforum.org/pipermail/discussion/attachments/20070214/11e65e89/attachment-0002.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image001.gif
Type: image/gif
Size: 21641 bytes
Desc: image001.gif
URL: <http://sipforum.org/pipermail/discussion/attachments/20070214/11e65e89/attachment-0002.gif>


More information about the discussion mailing list