[SIPForum-discussion] UA with T.38 support

Siva M-Q16748 sivam at motorola.com
Sat Feb 3 17:44:02 UTC 2007


Hi Franz
 
Atleast I hope there should be an IAF ( Internet Aware Fax ) Device
which could directly talk over SIP to the Internet without use of an
analog terminal adapter .
 
Please correct me if I am wrong
 
Regards
Siva

________________________________

From: Franz Edler [mailto:franz.edler at inode.at] 
Sent: Saturday, February 03, 2007 10:58 PM
To: Siva M-Q16748; discussion at sipforum.org
Subject: RE: [SIPForum-discussion] UA with T.38 support



I don't think so. T.38 is a protocol for efficient transport of
fax-communications over the Internet and a fax machine is a piece of
hardware which is usually connected to aa ATA (analog terminal adapter).
In case of the Speed Touch 780 this ATA is integrated into the modem.

 

You will never find T.38 support on a softphone.

 

Cheers

Franz

 

________________________________

From: Siva M-Q16748 [mailto:sivam at motorola.com] 
Sent: Saturday, February 03, 2007 6:06 PM
To: franz.edler at inode.at; discussion at sipforum.org
Subject: RE: [SIPForum-discussion] UA with T.38 support

 

Is there any soft phone for the same ??

 

________________________________

From: Franz Edler [mailto:franz.edler at inode.at] 
Sent: Saturday, February 03, 2007 4:52 PM
To: Siva M-Q16748; discussion at sipforum.org
Subject: RE: [SIPForum-discussion] UA with T.38 support

Speed Touch 780 from Thomson (http://www.speedtouch.co.uk/).

 It is a DSL modem with integrated SIP UA.

 

________________________________

From: discussion-bounces at sipforum.org
[mailto:discussion-bounces at sipforum.org] On Behalf Of Siva M-Q16748
Sent: Saturday, February 03, 2007 11:23 AM
To: discussion at sipforum.org
Subject: [SIPForum-discussion] UA with T.38 support

 

Hi

 

Does anyone have an idea about User Agent (end point ) that supports
T.38 Fax 

 

Regards

Siva

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://sipforum.org/pipermail/discussion/attachments/20070204/de7c9d1f/attachment-0002.html>


More information about the discussion mailing list