[SIPForum-discussion] Difference between \"Path\" and \"Record-Route\"

Nithyakumar.R nithyakr at huawei.com
Thu Feb 1 10:34:15 UTC 2007


Hi Anuj,

 

              Via headers are inserted by proxy to allow responses to find
their way back to the client. They have no influence on the routing of
future requests (or responses).

 

Record route also added by proxy and that have influence on the routing of
future requests (or responses).

 

Please correct me if am wrong..

 

       

Regards,

Nithyakumar.R

Huawei Technologies India Ltd.,

Bangalore,India.

 

 

 

 

 

This e-mail and attachments contain confidential information from HUAWEI,
which is intended only for the person or entity whose address is listed
above. Any use of the information contained herein in any way (including,
but not limited to, total or partial disclosure, reproduction, or
dissemination) by persons other than the intended recipient's) is
prohibited. If you receive this e-mail in error, please notify the sender by
phone or email immediately and delete it

 

  _____  

From: discussion-bounces at sipforum.org
[mailto:discussion-bounces at sipforum.org] On Behalf Of anuj
Sent: Thursday, February 01, 2007 3:04 PM
To: discussion at sipforum.org
Subject: [SIPForum-discussion] Difference between \"Path\" and
\"Record-Route\"

 

Hello!
The sip headers ,Path: and Record-route: are both used for forced routing
through proxys, and are also added by the proxys themselves.
What is then the difference between the two, except that Path is a 3GPP
header.?

Thanks in advance.
anuj

 
<http://adworks.rediff.com/cgi-bin/AdWorks/sigclick.cgi/www.rediff.com/signa
ture-home.htm/1507191490 at Middle5?PARTNER=3> 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://sipforum.org/pipermail/discussion/attachments/20070201/629f2848/attachment-0002.html>


More information about the discussion mailing list