[SIPForum-discussion] about the largest size of the payload

[Eugene Mednikov]

Greetings!
 
    RFC 3261 18.1.1 requres support for 64K message (including headers) over
UDP. 
 
    Some proxies does support that. 
 
    I haven't seen any phone that would support 64K though (I think 32K was
accepted).
 
Respectfully yours, Eugene Mednikov.
 
Software Engineer
Hermon Labs
972-4-6288001, 207
972-54-4520187
em at hermonlabs.com <blocked::mailto:em at hermonlabs.com> 
www.hermonlabs.com <blocked::http://www.hermonlabs.com> 
 

  _____  

From: Govindraj.B.H @ Gkk [mailto:govindraj_h at yahoo.co.in] 
Sent: Thursday, August 30, 2007 9:10 AM
To: Peili Xu; 'C?" "Io'; discussion at sipforum.org
Subject: Re: [SIPForum-discussion] about the largest size of the payload


The payload for UDP is 1000 octets and for TCP I think as Peoli mentioned
there is no limit.
If any one knows plz let us know the same.

Regards
Govindraj B H
 

Peili Xu <xupeili at huawei.com> wrote:

Hi,
 
It depends on the transport you want to use.
If by TCP, I don't think it will have specific limitation.
 
Peili
 

  _____  

From: discussion-bounces at sipforum.org
[mailto:discussion-bounces at sipforum.org] On Behalf Of Ç¿ Íõ
Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2007 5:01 PM
To: discussion at sipforum.org
Subject: [SIPForum-discussion] about the largest size of the payload


for SIP, how much is the largest size of the payload?  is 987 bytes?? 
  _____  

ÑÅ»¢Ãâ·ÑÓÊÏ䣬ȫÇòµÚÒ»ÓÊÏäÆ·ÅÆ£¡ <http://mail.yahoo.com.cn/?id=89034>
_______________________________________________
This is the SIP Forum discussion mailing list
TO UNSUBSCRIBE, or edit your delivery options, please visit
http://sipforum.org/mailman/listinfo/discussion
Post to the list at discussion at sipforum.org




  _____  

Why delete messages? Unlimited storage is just
<http://in.rd.yahoo.com/tagline_mail_1/*http://help.yahoo.com/l/in/yahoo/mai
l/yahoomail/tools/tools-08.html/> a click away.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://sipforum.org/pipermail/discussion/attachments/20070830/9e909af3/attachment-0002.html>