[SIPForum-discussion] regarding 180 ringing

[Srinivas .]

1.	Yes Crash means blindly you can raise the defect. Code is not
safe enough to avoid crash.
2.	In this UAC is acting correctly. It is the problem of UAS. 

 

________________________________

From: discussion-bounces at sipforum.org
[mailto:discussion-bounces at sipforum.org] On Behalf Of kiran chakkilam
Sent: Monday, April 16, 2007 11:29 AM
To: discussion at sipforum.org
Subject: [SIPForum-discussion] regarding 180 ringing

 

Dear all,

 

 

I am right now involved in testing of Proxy server. The scenario is
given below.

 

 

UAC ----> Proxy ---------> UAS

 

when UAS sending 180 ringing response towards UAC through Proxy I got
some doubts .

 

1) when UAS sending 180 ringing with out From and To headers The Proxy
server crashes ? ---- Is this scenario is right to raise the defect.I
have not found any information regarding this scenario.

 

2) when UAS sending with out call-id - then proxy forwards it towards
UAC but UAC not accepts it.-- Is this scenario is right to raise the
defect.

 

Please clarify my boubts ASAP

 

Thanks in Advance

 

ch.kiran



============================================================================================================================

Tech Mahindra, formerly Mahindra-British Telecom.
 
Disclaimer:

This message and the information contained herein is proprietary and confidential and subject to the Tech Mahindra policy statement, you may review at <a href="http://www.techmahindra.com/Disclaimer.html">http://www.techmahindra.com/Disclaimer.html</a> externally and <a href="http://tim.techmahindra.com/Disclaimer.html">http://tim.techmahindra.com/Disclaimer.html</a> internally within Tech Mahindra.

============================================================================================================================
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://sipforum.org/pipermail/discussion/attachments/20070416/4cbafc6f/attachment-0002.html>