[SIPForum-discussion] Putting Record route in the responses

[Steve DiStefano (sdistef)]

It may be a virus or some technical problem, but I think I have seen
this mail 8 times in the last 20 minutes???? 

-----Original Message-----
From: discussion-bounces at sipforum.org
[mailto:discussion-bounces at sipforum.org] On Behalf Of tariqz at comcast.net
Sent: Monday, October 23, 2006 3:55 PM
To: Manpreet Singh; discussion at sipforum.org;
sip-implementors at cs.columbia.edu
Subject: Re: [SIPForum-discussion] Putting Record route in the responses

Please remove me from this list immediately!


 -------------- Original message ----------------------
From: Manpreet Singh <msingh at ibasis.net>
> Could someone point me to the part of the spec which talks about what 
> all headers are to be inserted in all the response to an INVITE or any

> other request. I am bit lost trying to find the right explanation.
>  
> I am specifically looking for a case where a proxy inserts a 
> Record-Route header in the outgoing invite and the UAS rejects the 
> INVITE with some 5xx or a 4xx response. Now would the 4xx or 5xx 
> response carry the R-R headers from UAS to the proxy and then back to 
> UAC? I have generally seen the implementations where 100 doesnt carry
and 18x carries it.
>  
> thanks
>  
> Manpreet