[SIPForum-discussion] Regarding 183 Session Progress with SDP
Shrivastava, Keshav (Keshav)
kshrivastava at avaya.com
Fri Nov 8 12:34:37 UTC 2013
Hi Team,
I've a scenario where UAC is not acknowledging the SDP in 183 Session Progress sent by UAS (200 OK followed by 183 progress does not have any SDP). I noticed that the 183 Session Progress does not have any session header as specified by draft RFC http://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-ietf-sip-183-00.txt.
Who is wrong here UAC or UAS?
Thanks,
Keshav
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://sipforum.org/pipermail/discussion/attachments/20131108/2a8e338c/attachment-0002.html>
More information about the discussion
mailing list