[SIPForum-discussion] Sdp attribute for Call hold

[Vijay Badola]

If A and B parties are communicating with each other and A wants to put B on hold it will send "SENDONLY" in INVITE
and B in response to it should send "RECVONLY".
After some time if in between of hold condition, B also wants to put A on hold then B will send "INACTIVE" in INVITE and in response
to it A will send also "INACTIVE".
,Vijay

From: discussion-bounces at sipforum.org [mailto:discussion-bounces at sipforum.org] On Behalf Of ankur bansal
Sent: Wednesday, June 19, 2013 11:26 AM
To: discussion at sipforum.org
Subject: [SIPForum-discussion] Sdp attribute for Call hold

Hi All

Can anyone explain why a=sendonly is sent in offer from side performing HOLD ?
I think a=inactive should be right way of holding call .
Any specific scenario which explain when to use sendonly and when inactive

Thanks & regards
Ankur Bansal

________________________________

DISCLAIMER: The information in this message is confidential and may be legally privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this message by anyone else is unauthorized. If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, or distribution of the message, or any action or omission taken by you in reliance on it, is prohibited and may be unlawful. Please immediately contact the sender if you have received this message in error. Further, this e-mail may contain viruses and all reasonable precaution to minimize the risk arising there from is taken by OnMobile. OnMobile is not liable for any damage sustained by you as a result of any virus in this e-mail. All applicable virus checks should be carried out by you before opening this e-mail or any attachment thereto.
Thank you - OnMobile Global Limited.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://sipforum.org/pipermail/discussion/attachments/20130620/a9d2af7a/attachment.html