[SIPForum-discussion] A questions about sip
Abinash Sarangi
s_abinash at hotmail.com
Mon Jul 22 18:14:32 UTC 2013
Going on to IPv6 from IPv4 restricts the usage of 0.0.0.0 in "c"..one can increment "session version" and send media direction as "send only/recv only or inactive" under various circumstances..
Thanks
-Abinash
Date: Fri, 19 Jul 2013 07:50:26 -0700
From: sjames_1958 at yahoo.com
To: sumantasenapati993 at gmail.com; discussion at sipforum.org
Subject: Re: [SIPForum-discussion] A questions about sip
With an IP Address of 0.0.0.0 you cannot exchange RTCP packets.
Stephen James
sjames_1958 at yahoo.com We are not princes of the earth, we are the descendants of worms, and any nobility must be earned.
From: sumanta senapati <sumantasenapati993 at gmail.com>
To: discussion at sipforum.org
Sent: Tuesday, July 16, 2013 5:07 PM
Subject: [SIPForum-discussion] A questions about sip
Hi
Actually i have an question on call hold call flow.
Now a days we are using a=sendonly attribute or a= inactive instead of c=0.0.0.0 on putting any one hold,
What is the actually reason for this?why we use a=sendonly or a=inactive instead of c=0.0.0.0,what is the advantages
RegardsSumanta Senapati
_______________________________________________
This is the SIP Forum discussion mailing list
TO UNSUBSCRIBE, or edit your delivery options, please visit http://sipforum.org/mailman/listinfo/discussion
Post to the list at discussion at sipforum.org
_______________________________________________
This is the SIP Forum discussion mailing list
TO UNSUBSCRIBE, or edit your delivery options, please visit http://sipforum.org/mailman/listinfo/discussion
Post to the list at discussion at sipforum.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://sipforum.org/pipermail/discussion/attachments/20130722/0a6a34ed/attachment-0002.html>
More information about the discussion
mailing list